These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

532 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23652850)

  • 1. Diagnostic value of commercially available shear-wave elastography for breast cancers: integration into BI-RADS classification with subcategories of category 4.
    Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Han KH; Kim JA
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Oct; 23(10):2695-704. PubMed ID: 23652850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
    Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative evaluation of peripheral tissue elasticity for ultrasound-detected breast lesions.
    Xiao Y; Yu Y; Niu L; Qian M; Deng Z; Qiu W; Zheng H
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):896-904. PubMed ID: 27349474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combination of Quantitative Parameters of Shear Wave Elastography and Superb Microvascular Imaging to Evaluate Breast Masses.
    Lee EJ; Chang YW
    Korean J Radiol; 2020 Sep; 21(9):1045-1054. PubMed ID: 32691540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Qualitative pattern classification of shear wave elastography for breast masses: how it correlates to quantitative measurements.
    Yoon JH; Ko KH; Jung HK; Lee JT
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2199-204. PubMed ID: 24041435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
    Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions: comparison with two-dimensional shear-wave elastography.
    Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Chung J; Kim JA; Kim EK
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1519-27. PubMed ID: 23212276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic performance of 2D-shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of breast cancer: a clinical appraisal of cutoff values.
    Bartolotta TV; Orlando AAM; Dimarco M; Zarcaro C; Ferraro F; Cirino A; Matranga D; Vieni S; Cabibi D
    Radiol Med; 2022 Nov; 127(11):1209-1220. PubMed ID: 36114930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses.
    Berg WA; Cosgrove DO; Doré CJ; Schäfer FK; Svensson WE; Hooley RJ; Ohlinger R; Mendelson EB; Balu-Maestro C; Locatelli M; Tourasse C; Cavanaugh BC; Juhan V; Stavros AT; Tardivon A; Gay J; Henry JP; Cohen-Bacrie C;
    Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):435-49. PubMed ID: 22282182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic performance of qualitative shear-wave elastography according to different color map opacities for breast masses.
    Kim H; Youk JH; Gweon HM; Kim JA; Son EJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):e326-31. PubMed ID: 23545451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Added value of shear-wave elastography for evaluation of breast masses detected with screening US imaging.
    Lee SH; Chang JM; Kim WH; Bae MS; Seo M; Koo HR; Chu AJ; Gweon HM; Cho N; Moon WK
    Radiology; 2014 Oct; 273(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 24955927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential Diagnosis of Breast Category 3 and 4 Nodules Through BI-RADS Classification in Conjunction with Shear Wave Elastography.
    Wang M; Yang Z; Liu C; Yan J; Zhang W; Sun J; Cui G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 27988221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Additional diagnostic value of shear-wave elastography and color Doppler US for evaluation of breast non-mass lesions detected at B-mode US.
    Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES; Shin JH; Kim GR
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3542-9. PubMed ID: 26787603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A set of shear wave elastography quantitative parameters combined with ultrasound BI-RADS to assess benign and malignant breast lesions.
    Shi XQ; Li JL; Wan WB; Huang Y
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):960-6. PubMed ID: 25701532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shear Wave Elastography (SWE): An Analysis of Breast Lesion Characterization in 83 Breast Lesions.
    Feldmann A; Langlois C; Dewailly M; Martinez EF; Boulanger L; Kerdraon O; Faye N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2594-604. PubMed ID: 26159068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, combined with B-mode ultrasonography: qualitative and quantitative assessments.
    Youk JH; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim H; Park YJ; Kim JA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 40(10):2336-44. PubMed ID: 25130444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography - Virtual touch
    Dória MT; Jales RM; Conz L; Derchain SFM; Sarian LOZ
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():74-80. PubMed ID: 30927963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.
    Seo M; Ahn HS; Park SH; Lee JB; Choi BI; Sohn YM; Shin SY
    J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 28688156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and ultrasound elastography for management of BI-RADS category 4 nonpalpable breast masses.
    Niu Q; Zhao L; Wang R; Du L; Shi Q; Jia C; Li G; Jin L; Li F
    Eur J Radiol; 2024 Apr; 173():111391. PubMed ID: 38422608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utilizing size-based thresholds of stiffness gradient to reclassify BI-RADS category 3-4b lesions increases diagnostic performance.
    Shang J; Ruan LT; Wang YY; Zhang XJ; Dang Y; Liu B; Wang WL; Song Y; Chang SJ
    Clin Radiol; 2019 Apr; 74(4):306-313. PubMed ID: 30755314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.