These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23653099)
1. Is lateral pin fixation for displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus better than crossed pins in children? Zhao JG; Wang J; Zhang P Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Sep; 471(9):2942-53. PubMed ID: 23653099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Operative treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. The consequences of pin placement. Skaggs DL; Hale JM; Bassett J; Kaminsky C; Kay RM; Tolo VT J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 May; 83(5):735-40. PubMed ID: 11379744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of lateral entry with crossed entry pinning for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a meta-analysis. Na Y; Bai R; Zhao Z; Han C; Kong L; Ren Y; Liu W J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Apr; 13(1):68. PubMed ID: 29615086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medial and lateral crossed pinning versus lateral pinning for supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: decision analysis. Lee KM; Chung CY; Gwon DK; Sung KH; Kim TW; Choi IH; Cho TJ; Yoo WJ; Park MS J Pediatr Orthop; 2012 Mar; 32(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 22327446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lateral entry compared with medial and lateral entry pin fixation for completely displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children. A randomized clinical trial. Kocher MS; Kasser JR; Waters PM; Bae D; Snyder BD; Hresko MT; Hedequist D; Karlin L; Kim YJ; Murray MM; Millis MB; Emans JB; Dichtel L; Matheney T; Lee BM J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Apr; 89(4):706-12. PubMed ID: 17403790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of lateral entry and crossed entry pinning for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Zhao H; Xu S; Liu G; Zhao J; Wu S; Peng L J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Jun; 16(1):366. PubMed ID: 34107972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of two percutaneous pinning techniques (lateral vs medial-lateral) for Gartland type III pediatric supracondylar fracture of the humerus. Prashant K; Lakhotia D; Bhattacharyya TD; Mahanta AK; Ravoof A J Orthop Traumatol; 2016 Sep; 17(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 27312248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lateral-entry pin fixation in the management of supracondylar fractures in children. Skaggs DL; Cluck MW; Mostofi A; Flynn JM; Kay RM J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Apr; 86(4):702-7. PubMed ID: 15069133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A systematic review of medial and lateral entry pinning versus lateral entry pinning for supracondylar fractures of the humerus. Brauer CA; Lee BM; Bae DS; Waters PM; Kocher MS J Pediatr Orthop; 2007 Mar; 27(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 17314643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Medial-lateral versus lateral-only pinning fixation in children with displaced supracondylar humeral fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Xing B; Dong B; Che X J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Jan; 18(1):43. PubMed ID: 36647086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lateral entry compared with medial and lateral entry pin fixation for completely displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children. Surgical technique. Yen YM; Kocher MS J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Mar; 90 Suppl 2 Pt 1():20-30. PubMed ID: 18310684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The displaced supracondylar humerus fracture: indications for surgery and surgical options: a 2014 update. Ladenhauf HN; Schaffert M; Bauer J Curr Opin Pediatr; 2014 Feb; 26(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 24378825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury after the surgical treatment of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus: number needed to harm, a systematic review. Slobogean BL; Jackman H; Tennant S; Slobogean GP; Mulpuri K J Pediatr Orthop; 2010; 30(5):430-6. PubMed ID: 20574258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nerve injuries associated with pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a meta-analysis. Babal JC; Mehlman CT; Klein G J Pediatr Orthop; 2010; 30(3):253-63. PubMed ID: 20357592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The posterior intrafocal pin improves sagittal alignment in Gartland type III paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures. Kao HK; Lee WC; Yang WE; Chang CH Injury; 2016 Apr; 47(4):842-7. PubMed ID: 26777466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical analysis of supracondylar humerus fracture pinning for fractures with coronal lateral obliquity. Feng C; Guo Y; Zhu Z; Zhang J; Wang Y J Pediatr Orthop; 2012 Mar; 32(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 22327455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Advantages and disadvantages of the prone position in the surgical treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures in children. A literature review. De Pellegrin M; Fracassetti D; Moharamzadeh D; Origo C; Catena N Injury; 2018 Nov; 49 Suppl 3():S37-S42. PubMed ID: 30286976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: When Lateral Entry Pins Are Not Enough. Fabricant PD Instr Course Lect; 2024; 73():421-425. PubMed ID: 38090913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]