These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23653128)

  • 1. Foraging for thought: an inhibition-of-return-like effect resulting from directing attention within working memory.
    Johnson MR; Higgins JA; Norman KA; Sederberg PB; Smith TA; Johnson MK
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Jul; 24(7):1104-12. PubMed ID: 23653128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Re-examining the contribution of visuospatial working memory to inhibition of return.
    Vivas AB; Liaromati I; Masoura E; Chatzikallia K
    Psychol Res; 2010 Nov; 74(6):524-31. PubMed ID: 20091411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Refreshing and removing items in working memory: Different approaches to equivalent processes?
    Lintz EN; Johnson MR
    Cognition; 2021 Jun; 211():104655. PubMed ID: 33756245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adverse orienting effects on visual working memory encoding and maintenance.
    Wang B; Yan C; Wang Z; Olivers CNL; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1261-1267. PubMed ID: 27896633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age-related delay in reduced accessibility of refreshed items.
    Higgins JA; Johnson MR; Johnson MK
    Psychol Aging; 2020 Aug; 35(5):710-719. PubMed ID: 32744852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Refreshing memory traces: thinking of an item improves retrieval from visual working memory.
    Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():20-31. PubMed ID: 25557544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference.
    Barth A; Schneider D
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13062. PubMed ID: 29315628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exogenous attention influences visual short-term memory in infants.
    Ross-Sheehy S; Oakes LM; Luck SJ
    Dev Sci; 2011 May; 14(3):490-501. PubMed ID: 21477189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Where to attend next: guiding refreshing of visual, spatial, and verbal representations in working memory.
    Souza AS; Vergauwe E; Oberauer K
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):76-90. PubMed ID: 29683504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why does the probe value effect emerge in working memory? Examining the biased attentional refreshing account.
    Atkinson AL; Oberauer K; Allen RJ; Souza AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):891-900. PubMed ID: 35091995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is refreshing in working memory impaired in older age? Evidence from the retro-cue paradigm.
    Loaiza VM; Souza AS
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):175-189. PubMed ID: 29635867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the switching of the focus of attention within working memory: A combined event-related potential and behavioral study.
    Frenken M; Berti S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():30-41. PubMed ID: 29476873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Task-dependent effects of voluntary space-based and involuntary feature-based attention on visual working memory.
    Qian J; Zhang K; Lei Q; Han Y; Li W
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jul; 84(5):1304-1319. PubMed ID: 30840142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cognitive-behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of the affective consequences of ignoring stimulus representations in working memory.
    De Vito D; Ferrey AE; Fenske MJ; Al-Aidroos N
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 18(3):460-475. PubMed ID: 29546688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Focused, unfocused, and defocused information in working memory.
    Rerko L; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1075-96. PubMed ID: 23421511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A dual mechanism underlying retroactive shifts of auditory spatial attention: dissociating target- and distractor-related modulations of alpha lateralization.
    Klatt LI; Getzmann S; Begau A; Schneider D
    Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13860. PubMed ID: 32807850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial transposition gradients in visual working memory.
    Rerko L; Oberauer K; Lin HY
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 23663175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Facilitation and inhibition caused by the orienting of attention in propositional reasoning tasks.
    Cherubini P; Mazzocco A; Minelli S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Nov; 60(11):1496-523. PubMed ID: 17853220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.