These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23653286)

  • 1. Simulation-based uncertainty quantification of human arterial network hemodynamics.
    Chen P; Quarteroni A; Rozza G
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2013 Jun; 29(6):698-721. PubMed ID: 23653286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A stochastic collocation method for uncertainty quantification and propagation in cardiovascular simulations.
    Sankaran S; Marsden AL
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Mar; 133(3):031001. PubMed ID: 21303177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An anatomically detailed arterial network model for one-dimensional computational hemodynamics.
    Blanco PJ; Watanabe SM; Passos MA; Lemos PA; Feijóo RA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Feb; 62(2):736-53. PubMed ID: 25347874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uncertainty quantification of inflow boundary condition and proximal arterial stiffness-coupled effect on pulse wave propagation in a vascular network.
    Brault A; Dumas L; Lucor D
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2017 Oct; 33(10):. PubMed ID: 27943622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stochastic sensitivity analysis for timing and amplitude of pressure waves in the arterial system.
    Eck VG; Feinberg J; Langtangen HP; Hellevik LR
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2015 Apr; 31(4):e02711. PubMed ID: 25684213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An improved baseline model for a human arterial network to study the impact of aneurysms on pressure-flow waveforms.
    Low K; van Loon R; Sazonov I; Bevan RL; Nithiarasu P
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1224-46. PubMed ID: 23212798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uncertainty quantification in virtual surgery hemodynamics predictions for single ventricle palliation.
    Schiavazzi DE; Arbia G; Baker C; Hlavacek AM; Hsia TY; Marsden AL; Vignon-Clementel IE;
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2016 Mar; 32(3):e02737. PubMed ID: 26217878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental validation of a time-domain-based wave propagation model of blood flow in viscoelastic vessels.
    Bessems D; Giannopapa CG; Rutten MC; van de Vosse FN
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(2):284-91. PubMed ID: 18031750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of arterial wall models and measurement uncertainties on cardiovascular model predictions.
    Eck VG; Sturdy J; Hellevik LR
    J Biomech; 2017 Jan; 50():188-194. PubMed ID: 27890534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parametric uncertainty and global sensitivity analysis in a model of the carotid bifurcation: Identification and ranking of most sensitive model parameters.
    Gul R; Bernhard S
    Math Biosci; 2015 Nov; 269():104-16. PubMed ID: 26367184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards efficient uncertainty quantification in complex and large-scale biomechanical problems based on a Bayesian multi-fidelity scheme.
    Biehler J; Gee MW; Wall WA
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Jun; 14(3):489-513. PubMed ID: 25245816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An hemodynamic work bench for in-vitro measurements in arterial bifurcations: experimental results and comparison with the output of a simplified CFD model.
    Suárez-Bagnasco D; Armentano RL; Balay G; Negreira C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():735-8. PubMed ID: 24109792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biofluid dynamics at arterial bifurcations.
    Lou Z; Yang WJ
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1992; 19(6):455-93. PubMed ID: 1395653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of clinically-derived parametric data uncertainty in patient-specific coronary simulations with deformable walls.
    Seo J; Schiavazzi DE; Kahn AM; Marsden AL
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Aug; 36(8):e3351. PubMed ID: 32419369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incorporating Wind Power Forecast Uncertainties Into Stochastic Unit Commitment Using Neural Network-Based Prediction Intervals.
    Quan H; Srinivasan D; Khosravi A
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2015 Sep; 26(9):2123-35. PubMed ID: 25532191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review of the numerical analysis of blood flow in arterial bifurcations.
    Xu XY; Collins MW
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1990; 204(4):205-16. PubMed ID: 2090123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Numerical simulation of the relationship between blood pressure and blood stream of arteries].
    Shi X
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Dec; 22(6):1121-3, 1127. PubMed ID: 16422080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fast blood-flow simulation for large arterial trees containing thousands of vessels.
    Muller A; Clarke R; Ho H
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Feb; 20(2):160-170. PubMed ID: 27376402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Concentration wave of a solute in an artery: the influence of curvature.
    Pontrelli G; Tatone A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2007 Apr; 10(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 18651279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Numerical study of pressure and flow propagation in arteries.
    Stergiopulos N; Young DF; Rogge TR
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1991; 27():93-104. PubMed ID: 2065183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.