343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23653432)
1. Fast and accurate generation of ab initio quality atomic charges using nonparametric statistical regression.
Rai BK; Bakken GA
J Comput Chem; 2013 Jul; 34(19):1661-71. PubMed ID: 23653432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of charge models for fixed-charge force fields: small-molecule hydration free energies in explicit solvent.
Mobley DL; Dumont E; Chodera JD; Dill KA
J Phys Chem B; 2007 Mar; 111(9):2242-54. PubMed ID: 17291029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new force field (ECEPP-05) for peptides, proteins, and organic molecules.
Arnautova YA; Jagielska A; Scheraga HA
J Phys Chem B; 2006 Mar; 110(10):5025-44. PubMed ID: 16526746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.
Jakalian A; Jack DB; Bayly CI
J Comput Chem; 2002 Dec; 23(16):1623-41. PubMed ID: 12395429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electronegativity equalization method: parameterization and validation for organic molecules using the Merz-Kollman-Singh charge distribution scheme.
Jirousková Z; Vareková RS; Vanek J; Koca J
J Comput Chem; 2009 May; 30(7):1174-8. PubMed ID: 18988249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions.
Marenich AV; Cramer CJ; Truhlar DG
J Phys Chem B; 2009 May; 113(18):6378-96. PubMed ID: 19366259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Partial Atomic Charges and Screened Charge Models of the Electrostatic Potential.
Wang B; Truhlar DG
J Chem Theory Comput; 2012 Jun; 8(6):1989-98. PubMed ID: 26593833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of free energies of hydration using CM1 and CM3 atomic charges.
Udier-Blagović M; Morales De Tirado P; Pearlman SA; Jorgensen WL
J Comput Chem; 2004 Aug; 25(11):1322-32. PubMed ID: 15185325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Calculating solvation energies by means of a fluctuating charge model combined with continuum solvent model.
Zhao DX; Yu L; Gong LD; Liu C; Yang ZZ
J Chem Phys; 2011 May; 134(19):194115. PubMed ID: 21599052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting pK(a) values of substituted phenols from atomic charges: comparison of different quantum mechanical methods and charge distribution schemes.
Svobodová Vareková R; Geidl S; Ionescu CM; Skrehota O; Kudera M; Sehnal D; Bouchal T; Abagyan R; Huber HJ; Koca J
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Aug; 51(8):1795-806. PubMed ID: 21761919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. S/G-1: an ab initio force-field blending frozen Hermite Gaussian densities and distributed multipoles. Proof of concept and first applications to metal cations.
Chaudret R; Gresh N; Narth C; Lagardère L; Darden TA; Cisneros GA; Piquemal JP
J Phys Chem A; 2014 Sep; 118(35):7598-612. PubMed ID: 24878003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fast tools for calculation of atomic charges well suited for drug design.
Shulga DA; Oliferenko AA; Pisarev SA; Palyulin VA; Zefirov NS
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2008; 19(1-2):153-65. PubMed ID: 18311641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A modified electronegativity equalization method for fast and accurate calculation of atomic charges in large biological molecules.
Ouyang Y; Ye F; Liang Y
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2009 Aug; 11(29):6082-9. PubMed ID: 19606317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reaction path potential for complex systems derived from combined ab initio quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical calculations.
Lu Z; Yang W
J Chem Phys; 2004 Jul; 121(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 15260525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A fast empirical GAFF compatible partial atomic charge assignment scheme for modeling interactions of small molecules with biomolecular targets.
Mukherjee G; Patra N; Barua P; Jayaram B
J Comput Chem; 2011 Apr; 32(5):893-907. PubMed ID: 21341292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. General methodology to optimize damping functions to account for charge penetration effects in electrostatic calculations using multicentered multipolar expansions.
Werneck AS; Filho TM; Dardenne LE
J Phys Chem A; 2008 Jan; 112(2):268-80. PubMed ID: 18095663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conformational dependence of charges in protein simulations.
Söderhjelm P; Ryde U
J Comput Chem; 2009 Apr; 30(5):750-60. PubMed ID: 18773405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ab initio calculation of electrostatic multipoles with Wannier functions for large-scale biomolecular simulations.
Sagui C; Pomorski P; Darden TA; Roland C
J Chem Phys; 2004 Mar; 120(9):4530-44. PubMed ID: 15268621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The treatment of solvation by a generalized Born model and a self-consistent charge-density functional theory-based tight-binding method.
Xie L; Liu H
J Comput Chem; 2002 Nov; 23(15):1404-15. PubMed ID: 12370943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calculation of the free energy of polarization: quantifying the effect of explicitly treating electronic polarization on the transferability of force-field parameters.
Geerke DP; van Gunsteren WF
J Phys Chem B; 2007 Jun; 111(23):6425-36. PubMed ID: 17508737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
