These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23654039)

  • 1. Compliments and receptivity to a courtship request: a field experiment.
    Guéguen N; Fischer-Lokou J; Lamy L
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Feb; 112(1):239-42. PubMed ID: 23654039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Foot-in-the-door technique using a courtship request: a field experiment.
    Guéguen N; Marchand M; Pascual A; Lourel M
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Oct; 103(2):529-34. PubMed ID: 19102478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of solicitor sex and attractiveness on receptivity to sexual offers: a field study.
    Guéguen N
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Oct; 40(5):915-9. PubMed ID: 21369773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The receptivity of women to courtship solicitation across the menstrual cycle: a field experiment.
    Gueguen N
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 19070644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Say it...near the flower shop": further evidence of the effect of flowers on mating.
    Guéguen N
    J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(5):529-32. PubMed ID: 22930994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low-ball and compliance to a request: an application in a field setting.
    Guéguen N; Pascual A; Dagot L
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Aug; 91(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 12353806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Young women's narratives of same-sex sexual desire in adolescence.
    Logan C; Buchanan M
    J Lesbian Stud; 2008; 12(4):473-500. PubMed ID: 19042753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. THE EFFECT OF THE "EVOKING FREEDOM" TECHNIQUE ON AN UNUSUAL AND DISTURBING REQUEST.
    Guéguen N; Silone F; David M; Pascual A
    Psychol Rep; 2015 Jun; 116(3):936-40. PubMed ID: 26030208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Women prefer men who use metaphorical language when paying compliments in a romantic context.
    Gao Z; Gao S; Xu L; Zheng X; Ma X; Luo L; Kendrick KM
    Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():40871. PubMed ID: 28181992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Men's sense of humor and women's responses to courtship solicitations: an experimental field study.
    Guéguen N
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Aug; 107(1):145-56. PubMed ID: 20923058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Commitment and the responsive bystander: a field evaluation with a less problematic request.
    Guéguen N
    Psychol Rep; 2014 Oct; 115(2):607-11. PubMed ID: 25153842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The lure technique: replication and refinement in a field setting.
    Marchand M; Joule RV; Guéguen N
    Psychol Rep; 2015 Feb; 116(1):275-9. PubMed ID: 25539175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Courtship communication and perception.
    Moore MM
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Feb; 94(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 11883596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mimicry and helping behavior: an evaluation of mimicry on explicit helping request.
    Guéguen N; Martin A; Meineri S
    J Soc Psychol; 2011; 151(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 21375122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexual boundaries: an examination of the importance of talking before touching.
    Winslett AH; Gross AM
    Violence Against Women; 2008 May; 14(5):542-62. PubMed ID: 18408172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid endocrine responses of young men to social interactions with young women.
    Roney JR; Lukaszewski AW; Simmons ZL
    Horm Behav; 2007 Sep; 52(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 17585911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Courtship feeding in humans? The effects of feeding versus providing food on perceived attraction and intimacy.
    Alley TR; Brubaker LW; Fox OM
    Hum Nat; 2013 Dec; 24(4):430-43. PubMed ID: 24105261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increasing compliance with a request: two touches are more effective than one.
    Vaidis DC; Halimi-Falkowicz SG
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Aug; 103(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 18982940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How can you resist? Executive control helps romantically involved individuals to stay faithful.
    Pronk TM; Karremans JC; Wigboldus DH
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 May; 100(5):827-37. PubMed ID: 21244181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does a Favor Request Increase Liking Toward the Requester?
    Niiya Y
    J Soc Psychol; 2016; 156(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 26392141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.