These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23654411)

  • 1. The role of binary mask patterns in automatic speech recognition in background noise.
    Narayanan A; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3083-93. PubMed ID: 23654411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech intelligibility in reverberation with ideal binary masking: effects of early reflections and signal-to-noise ratio threshold.
    Roman N; Woodruff J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1707-17. PubMed ID: 23464040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of mask pattern in intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech.
    Kjems U; Boldt JB; Pedersen MS; Lunner T; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1415-26. PubMed ID: 19739755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of ideal mask-based speech enhancement algorithms for speech mixed with white noise at low mixture signal-to-noise ratios.
    Graetzer S; Hopkins C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3458. PubMed ID: 36586840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recognition of speech in noise after application of time-frequency masks: dependence on frequency and threshold parameters.
    Sinex DG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2390-6. PubMed ID: 23556604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The optimal ratio time-frequency mask for speech separation in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio.
    Liang S; Liu W; Jiang W; Xue W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL452-8. PubMed ID: 24181990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intelligibility of reverberant noisy speech with ideal binary masking.
    Roman N; Woodruff J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2153-61. PubMed ID: 21973369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of the division between early and late reflections on intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech.
    Li J; Xia R; Fang Q; Li A; Pan J; Yan Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2801-10. PubMed ID: 25994708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
    Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of speech-intrinsic variations on human and automatic recognition of spoken phonemes.
    Meyer BT; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):388-403. PubMed ID: 21303019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Matrix sentence intelligibility prediction using an automatic speech recognition system.
    Schädler MR; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():100-7. PubMed ID: 26383042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long short-term memory for speaker generalization in supervised speech separation.
    Chen J; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4705. PubMed ID: 28679261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual learning for speech in noise after application of binary time-frequency masks.
    Ahmadi M; Gross VL; Sinex DG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1687-92. PubMed ID: 23464038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of phase estimation on single-channel speech separation based on time-frequency masking.
    Mayer F; Williamson DS; Mowlaee P; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4668. PubMed ID: 28679243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech perception of noise with binary gains.
    Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2303-7. PubMed ID: 19062868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An ideal quantized mask to increase intelligibility and quality of speech in noise.
    Healy EW; Vasko JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Sep; 144(3):1392. PubMed ID: 30424638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relative importance of spectral cues for vowel recognition in severe noise.
    Swanepoel R; Oosthuizen DJ; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2652-62. PubMed ID: 23039458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.