554 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23656099)
1. English vowel identification in long-term speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English and Chinese listeners.
Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Jin SH; Liu C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23656099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. English sentence recognition in speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native listeners.
Jin SH; Liu C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23145700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mandarin Chinese vowel-plus-tone identification in noise: Effects of language experience.
Li M; Wang W; Tao S; Dong Q; Guan J; Liu C
Hear Res; 2016 Jan; 331():109-18. PubMed ID: 26611794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. English Consonant Identification in Multi-Talker Babble: Effects of Chinese-Native Listeners' English Experience.
Tao S; Chen Y; Wang W; Dong Q; Jin SH; Liu C
Lang Speech; 2019 Sep; 62(3):531-545. PubMed ID: 30070165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
Liu C; Jin SH
Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vowel identification in temporal-modulated noise for native and non-native listeners: Effect of language experience.
Guan J; Liu C; Tao S; Mi L; Wang W; Dong Q
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1670-7. PubMed ID: 26428804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. English vowel identification and vowel formant discrimination by native Mandarin Chinese- and native English-speaking listeners: The effect of vowel duration dependence.
Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Guan J; Liu C
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():58-65. PubMed ID: 26768853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contribution of low-frequency harmonics to Mandarin Chinese tone identification in quiet and six-talker babble background.
Liu C; Azimi B; Bhandary M; Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):428-38. PubMed ID: 24437783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of speaker variability and noise on Mandarin fricative identification by native and non-native listeners.
Lee CY; Zhang Y; Li X; Tao L; Bond ZS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1130-40. PubMed ID: 22894232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
Phatak SA; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Formant discrimination of speech and non-speech sounds for English and Chinese listeners.
Liu C; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):EL189-95. PubMed ID: 22979831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels for native speakers of Greek.
Lengeris A; Hazan V
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3757-68. PubMed ID: 21218907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Just noticeable difference of tone pitch contour change for English- and Chinese-native listeners.
Liu C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3011-20. PubMed ID: 24116436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of noise, reverberation and foreign accent on native and non-native listeners' performance of English speech comprehension.
Peng ZE; Wang LM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2772. PubMed ID: 27250170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of talker variability on word recognition in non-native listeners.
van Dommelen WA; Hazan V
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1690-9. PubMed ID: 22978897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The relative importance of spectral cues for vowel recognition in severe noise.
Swanepoel R; Oosthuizen DJ; Hanekom JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2652-62. PubMed ID: 23039458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Second-language experience and speech-in-noise recognition: effects of talker-listener accent similarity.
Pinet M; Iverson P; Huckvale M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1653-62. PubMed ID: 21895102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring effectiveness of semantic cues in degraded English sentences in non-native listeners.
Shi LF
Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 24003982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
