These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23656101)

  • 1. Modifying the normalized covariance metric measure to account for nonlinear distortions introduced by noise-reduction algorithms.
    Chen F; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL405-11. PubMed ID: 23656101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility. II: An attempt to validate physical metrics.
    Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 24437784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigation of objective measures for intelligibility prediction of noise-reduced speech for Chinese, Japanese, and English.
    Li J; Xia R; Ying D; Yan Y; Akagi M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3301. PubMed ID: 25480075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extending the articulation index to account for non-linear distortions introduced by noise-suppression algorithms.
    Loizou PC; Ma J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):986-95. PubMed ID: 21877811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of a simplified normalized covariance measure based on binary weighting functions for predicting the intelligibility of noise-suppressed speech.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3715-23. PubMed ID: 21218903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Signal-to-noise ratio adaptive post-filtering method for intelligibility enhancement of telephone speech.
    Jokinen E; Yrttiaho S; Pulakka H; Vainio M; Alku P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3990-4001. PubMed ID: 23231128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gain-induced speech distortions and the absence of intelligibility benefit with existing noise-reduction algorithms.
    Kim G; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1581-96. PubMed ID: 21895096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech intelligibility in reverberation with ideal binary masking: effects of early reflections and signal-to-noise ratio threshold.
    Roman N; Woodruff J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1707-17. PubMed ID: 23464040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.
    Qazi OU; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():79-87. PubMed ID: 23396271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices.
    Gustafson SJ; Pittman AL
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 21047291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of speech modification on non-native listeners for matrix-style sentences.
    Cooke M; García Lecumberri ML; Tang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL151-7. PubMed ID: 25698043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech enhancement using a generic noise codebook.
    Srinivasan S; Rao Naidu DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL161-7. PubMed ID: 22894316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
    Chen F; Wong LL; Tahmina Q; Azimi B; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
    Koning R; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of noise envelope modulation on quality judgments of noisy speech.
    Jin IK; Kates JM; Arehart KH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 23039565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.