These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23656113)

  • 1. Hierarchical Nyström methods for constructing Markov state models for conformational dynamics.
    Yao Y; Cui RZ; Bowman GR; Silva DA; Sun J; Huang X
    J Chem Phys; 2013 May; 138(17):174106. PubMed ID: 23656113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An efficient Bayesian kinetic lumping algorithm to identify metastable conformational states via Gibbs sampling.
    Wang W; Liang T; Sheong FK; Fan X; Huang X
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Aug; 149(7):072337. PubMed ID: 30134698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. RPnet: a reverse-projection-based neural network for coarse-graining metastable conformational states for protein dynamics.
    Gu H; Wang W; Cao S; Unarta IC; Yao Y; Sheong FK; Huang X
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2022 Jan; 24(3):1462-1474. PubMed ID: 34985469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hierarchical analysis of conformational dynamics in biomolecules: transition networks of metastable states.
    Noé F; Horenko I; Schütte C; Smith JC
    J Chem Phys; 2007 Apr; 126(15):155102. PubMed ID: 17461666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Markov state models from hierarchical density-based assignment.
    Mitxelena I; López X; de Sancho D
    J Chem Phys; 2021 Aug; 155(5):054102. PubMed ID: 34364321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simulating the T-jump-triggered unfolding dynamics of trpzip2 peptide and its time-resolved IR and two-dimensional IR signals using the Markov state model approach.
    Zhuang W; Cui RZ; Silva DA; Huang X
    J Phys Chem B; 2011 May; 115(18):5415-24. PubMed ID: 21388153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the advantages of exploiting memory in Markov state models for biomolecular dynamics.
    Cao S; Montoya-Castillo A; Wang W; Markland TE; Huang X
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Jul; 153(1):014105. PubMed ID: 32640825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic state partitioning for multibody systems (APM): an efficient algorithm for constructing Markov state models to elucidate conformational dynamics of multibody systems.
    Sheong FK; Silva DA; Meng L; Zhao Y; Huang X
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jan; 11(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 26574199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic discovery of metastable states for the construction of Markov models of macromolecular conformational dynamics.
    Chodera JD; Singhal N; Pande VS; Dill KA; Swope WC
    J Chem Phys; 2007 Apr; 126(15):155101. PubMed ID: 17461665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of weighted ensemble and Markov state model methodologies.
    Feng H; Costaouec R; Darve E; Izaguirre JA
    J Chem Phys; 2015 Jun; 142(21):214113. PubMed ID: 26049485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Minimum Variance Clustering Approach Produces Robust and Interpretable Coarse-Grained Models.
    Husic BE; McKiernan KA; Wayment-Steele HK; Sultan MM; Pande VS
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Feb; 14(2):1071-1082. PubMed ID: 29253336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic neutron scattering from conformational dynamics. II. Application using molecular dynamics simulation and Markov modeling.
    Yi Z; Lindner B; Prinz JH; Noé F; Smith JC
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Nov; 139(17):175102. PubMed ID: 24206335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dimensional reduction of Markov state models from renormalization group theory.
    Orioli S; Faccioli P
    J Chem Phys; 2016 Sep; 145(12):124120. PubMed ID: 27782633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. GRadient Adaptive Decomposition (GRAD) Method: Optimized Refinement Along Macrostate Borders in Markov State Models.
    Romano PG; Guenza MG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Nov; 57(11):2729-2740. PubMed ID: 29035546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Markov state models provide insights into dynamic modulation of protein function.
    Shukla D; Hernández CX; Weber JK; Pande VS
    Acc Chem Res; 2015 Feb; 48(2):414-22. PubMed ID: 25625937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Bayesian method for construction of Markov models to describe dynamics on various time-scales.
    Rains EK; Andersen HC
    J Chem Phys; 2010 Oct; 133(14):144113. PubMed ID: 20949993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Constructing multi-resolution Markov State Models (MSMs) to elucidate RNA hairpin folding mechanisms.
    Huang X; Yao Y; Bowman GR; Sun J; Guibas LJ; Carlsson G; Pande VS
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2010; ():228-39. PubMed ID: 19908375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sparsity-weighted outlier FLOODing (OFLOOD) method: Efficient rare event sampling method using sparsity of distribution.
    Harada R; Nakamura T; Shigeta Y
    J Comput Chem; 2016 Mar; 37(8):724-38. PubMed ID: 26611770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Information Bottleneck Approach for Markov Model Construction.
    Wang D; Qiu Y; Beyerle ER; Huang X; Tiwary P
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 Jun; 20(12):5352-5367. PubMed ID: 38859575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved coarse-graining of Markov state models via explicit consideration of statistical uncertainty.
    Bowman GR
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Oct; 137(13):134111. PubMed ID: 23039589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.