These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23656965)

  • 41. NerveCenter: Biomedical research funding a vital part of the economic stimulus plan.
    Lindsey H
    Ann Neurol; 2009 Feb; 65(2):A9-A11. PubMed ID: 19260032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Proposed changes to biomedical funding.
    Dressler GR
    Science; 2005 Nov; 310(5752):1279. PubMed ID: 16311319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Biomedical research. NIH plans new grants for innovative minds.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2003 Aug; 301(5635):902. PubMed ID: 12920271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. NIH innovation letter.
    Ness RB
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 May; 16(5):411-2. PubMed ID: 16647632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Stem-cell lines.
    Wall St J (East Ed); 2005 May; ():A12. PubMed ID: 15966127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. U.S. economic recovery. Science groups emphasize jobs in push for more research funding.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2009 Jan; 323(5912):318-9. PubMed ID: 19150814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Biomedical funding. A bumpy landing for cancer research.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5660):936-7. PubMed ID: 14963292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. NIH awards nearly 4 million US dollars in support of bench-to-bedside research.
    J Investig Med; 2006 Sep; 54(6):286. PubMed ID: 17134613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The NIH budget and the future of biomedical research.
    Loscalzo J
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Apr; 354(16):1665-7. PubMed ID: 16625006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Economic over-stimulation?
    Johnston SC; Hauser SL
    Ann Neurol; 2009 Apr; 65(4):A7-8. PubMed ID: 19399856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The obligation for biologists to commit to political advocacy.
    Pollard TD
    Cell; 2012 Oct; 151(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 23063115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Research funding. Structural disequilibria in biomedical research.
    Teitelbaum MS
    Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5889):644-5. PubMed ID: 18669847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Biomedical research. Peering over a cliff at the poststimulus world.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2010 May; 328(5979):676. PubMed ID: 20448157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Disappointment in slow-down for biomedical funding.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2005 Feb; 433(7026):559. PubMed ID: 15729751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Setting priorities for science support.
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(3):21-3. PubMed ID: 9669178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. AIDS vaccines. The first shot in a highly targeted strategy.
    Cohen J
    Science; 2004 Nov; 306(5700):1276-7. PubMed ID: 15550634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Supporting the NIH before it is too late.
    Liang TJ
    Hepatology; 2006 Jul; 44(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16799988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients.
    Dove A
    Nat Med; 2006 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 16397535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Declines in NIH R01 research grant funding.
    Mandel HG; Vesell ES
    Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):189. PubMed ID: 18845728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Biomedical research funding. A minority viewpoint.
    Price M
    Science; 2011 Aug; 333(6045):926. PubMed ID: 21852463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.