These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23657352)
1. Long-term speech perception in elderly cochlear implant users. Dillon MT; Buss E; Adunka MC; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Adunka OF; Buchman CA JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Mar; 139(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 23657352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants. Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study. Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults. Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improvement of cognitive function after cochlear implantation in elderly patients. Mosnier I; Bebear JP; Marx M; Fraysse B; Truy E; Lina-Granade G; Mondain M; Sterkers-Artières F; Bordure P; Robier A; Godey B; Meyer B; Frachet B; Poncet-Wallet C; Bouccara D; Sterkers O JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 May; 141(5):442-50. PubMed ID: 25763680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. HiResolution and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability. Koch DB; Osberger MJ; Segel P; Kessler D Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 15205549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of front-end processing on cochlear implant performance of children. Wolfe J; Schafer EC; John A; Hudson M Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 21436756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of preoperative residual hearing on speech perception after cochlear implantation. Adunka OF; Buss E; Clark MS; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA Laryngoscope; 2008 Nov; 118(11):2044-9. PubMed ID: 18813141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears. Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cochlear implant performance in geriatric patients. Lenarz M; Sönmez H; Joseph G; Büchner A; Lenarz T Laryngoscope; 2012 Jun; 122(6):1361-5. PubMed ID: 22539093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants. Uziel AS; Sillon M; Vieu A; Artieres F; Piron JP; Daures JP; Mondain M Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech perception comparisons using an implanted and an external microphone in existing cochlear implant users. Jenkins HA; Uhler K Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jan; 33(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 22158017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants. Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Outcomes of the Cochlear™ Nucleus(®) 5 Cochlear Implant System and SmartSound™ 2 Signal Processing. Runge CL; Henion K; Tarima S; Beiter A; Zwolan TA J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):425-440. PubMed ID: 27310402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users. Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recovery from forward masking in elderly cochlear implant users. Lee ER; Friedland DR; Runge CL Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):355-63. PubMed ID: 22410729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of cochlear implantation on speech understanding, depression, and loneliness in the elderly. Poissant SF; Beaudoin F; Huang J; Brodsky J; Lee DJ J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):488-94. PubMed ID: 19128581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of speech perception performance between Sprint/Esprit 3G and Freedom processors in children implanted with nucleus cochlear implants. Santarelli R; Magnavita V; De Filippi R; Ventura L; Genovese E; Arslan E Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 19225440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]