These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23658120)

  • 1. Can quantitative sensory testing predict responses to analgesic treatment?
    Grosen K; Fischer IW; Olesen AE; Drewes AM
    Eur J Pain; 2013 Oct; 17(9):1267-80. PubMed ID: 23658120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting the analgesic effect to oxycodone by 'static' and 'dynamic' quantitative sensory testing in healthy subjects.
    Eisenberg E; Midbari A; Haddad M; Pud D
    Pain; 2010 Oct; 151(1):104-109. PubMed ID: 20621419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative sensory tests fairly reflect immediate effects of oxycodone in chronic low-back pain.
    Schliessbach J; Siegenthaler A; Bütikofer L; Vuilleumier P; Jüni P; Arendt-Nielsen L; Curatolo M
    Scand J Pain; 2017 Oct; 17():107-115. PubMed ID: 28850362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The predictive value of quantitative sensory testing: a systematic review on chronic postoperative pain and the analgesic effect of pharmacological therapies in patients with chronic pain.
    Petersen KK; Vaegter HB; Stubhaug A; Wolff A; Scammell BE; Arendt-Nielsen L; Larsen DB
    Pain; 2021 Jan; 162(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 32701654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of static and dynamic quantitative sensory testing in patients with painful chronic pancreatitis.
    Olesen SS; van Goor H; Bouwense SA; Wilder-Smith OH; Drewes AM
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2012; 37(5):530-6. PubMed ID: 22854397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting drug efficacy in chronic low back pain by quantitative sensory tests.
    Schliessbach J; Siegenthaler A; Bütikofer L; Vuilleumier P; Jüni P; Stamer U; Arendt-Nielsen L; Curatolo M
    Eur J Pain; 2018 May; 22(5):973-988. PubMed ID: 29363217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative sensory testing predicts pregabalin efficacy in painful chronic pancreatitis.
    Olesen SS; Graversen C; Bouwense SA; van Goor H; Wilder-Smith OH; Drewes AM
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e57963. PubMed ID: 23469256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association between sensitisation and pain-related behaviours in an experimental canine model of osteoarthritis.
    Rialland P; Otis C; Moreau M; Pelletier JP; Martel-Pelletier J; Beaudry F; Del Castillo JR; Bertaim T; Gauvin D; Troncy E
    Pain; 2014 Oct; 155(10):2071-9. PubMed ID: 25075591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Thermal quantitative sensory testing to predict postoperative pain outcomes following gynecologic surgery.
    Ahmad S; De Oliveira GS; Bialek JM; McCarthy RJ
    Pain Med; 2014 May; 15(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 24517836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can quantitative sensory testing move us closer to mechanism-based pain management?
    Cruz-Almeida Y; Fillingim RB
    Pain Med; 2014 Jan; 15(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 24010588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Association between quantitative sensory testing and pain or disability in paediatric chronic pain: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schoth DE; Blankenburg M; Wager J; Broadbent P; Zhang J; Zernikow B; Liossi C
    BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e031861. PubMed ID: 31594898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) associated with quantitative sensory testing (QST)? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Neblett R; Sanabria-Mazo JP; Luciano JV; Mirčić M; Čolović P; Bojanić M; Jeremić-Knežević M; Aleksandrić T; Knežević A
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2024 Jun; 161():105612. PubMed ID: 38604015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The long-term reliability of static and dynamic quantitative sensory testing in healthy individuals.
    Marcuzzi A; Wrigley PJ; Dean CM; Adams R; Hush JM
    Pain; 2017 Jul; 158(7):1217-1223. PubMed ID: 28328574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative sensory testing: identifying pain characteristics in patients with osteoarthritis.
    Arant KR; Katz JN; Neogi T
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2022 Jan; 30(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 34597800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of quantitative sensory testing in cancer pain assessment: A systematic review.
    Martland ME; Rashidi AS; Bennett MI; Fallon M; Jones C; Rolke R; Mulvey MR
    Eur J Pain; 2020 Apr; 24(4):669-684. PubMed ID: 31823467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are preoperative experimental pain assessments correlated with clinical pain outcomes after surgery? A systematic review.
    Sangesland A; Støren C; Vaegter HB
    Scand J Pain; 2017 Apr; 15():44-52. PubMed ID: 28850344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative sensory testing in dogs with painful disease: A window to pain mechanisms?
    Hunt J; Knazovicky D; Lascelles BDX; Murrell J
    Vet J; 2019 Jan; 243():33-41. PubMed ID: 30606437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental and clinical applications of quantitative sensory testing applied to skin, muscles and viscera.
    Arendt-Nielsen L; Yarnitsky D
    J Pain; 2009 Jun; 10(6):556-72. PubMed ID: 19380256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive value of quantitative sensory testing for acute and chronic postsurgical pain after total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review.
    Paredes AC; Pinto JM; Almeida A; Pinto PR
    Pain; 2022 Mar; 163(3):e385-e400. PubMed ID: 34224493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cannabinoid effects on responses to quantitative sensory testing among individuals with and without clinical pain: a systematic review.
    Mun CJ; Letzen JE; Peters EN; Campbell CM; Vandrey R; Gajewski-Nemes J; DiRenzo D; Caufield-Noll C; Finan PH
    Pain; 2020 Feb; 161(2):244-260. PubMed ID: 31613869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.