279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23658172)
1. Cholinergic control over attention in rats prone to attribute incentive salience to reward cues.
Paolone G; Angelakos CC; Meyer PJ; Robinson TE; Sarter M
J Neurosci; 2013 May; 33(19):8321-35. PubMed ID: 23658172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Unresponsive Choline Transporter as a Trait Neuromarker and a Causal Mediator of Bottom-Up Attentional Biases.
Koshy Cherian A; Kucinski A; Pitchers K; Yegla B; Parikh V; Kim Y; Valuskova P; Gurnani S; Lindsley CW; Blakely RD; Sarter M
J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(11):2947-2959. PubMed ID: 28193693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The ability for cocaine and cocaine-associated cues to compete for attention.
Pitchers KK; Wood TR; Skrzynski CJ; Robinson TE; Sarter M
Behav Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 320():302-315. PubMed ID: 27890441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sign tracking predicts cue-induced but not drug-primed reinstatement to methamphetamine seeking in rats: Effects of oxytocin treatment.
Everett NA; Carey HA; Cornish JL; Baracz SJ
J Psychopharmacol; 2020 Nov; 34(11):1271-1279. PubMed ID: 33081558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 'Hot' vs. 'cold' behavioural-cognitive styles: motivational-dopaminergic vs. cognitive-cholinergic processing of a Pavlovian cocaine cue in sign- and goal-tracking rats.
Pitchers KK; Kane LF; Kim Y; Robinson TE; Sarter M
Eur J Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 46(11):2768-2781. PubMed ID: 29044780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diverse Roads to Relapse: A Discriminative Cue Signaling Cocaine Availability Is More Effective in Renewing Cocaine Seeking in Goal Trackers Than Sign Trackers and Depends on Basal Forebrain Cholinergic Activity.
Pitchers KK; Phillips KB; Jones JL; Robinson TE; Sarter M
J Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 37(30):7198-7208. PubMed ID: 28659281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to a reward-related cue: influence on cocaine sensitization.
Flagel SB; Watson SJ; Akil H; Robinson TE
Behav Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 186(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 17719099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rats that sign-track are resistant to Pavlovian but not instrumental extinction.
Ahrens AM; Singer BF; Fitzpatrick CJ; Morrow JD; Robinson TE
Behav Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 296():418-430. PubMed ID: 26235331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic Encoding of Incentive Salience in the Ventral Pallidum: Dependence on the Form of the Reward Cue.
Ahrens AM; Ferguson LM; Robinson TE; Aldridge JW
eNeuro; 2018; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 29740595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Individual variation in the motivational properties of a nicotine cue: sign-trackers vs. goal-trackers.
Yager LM; Robinson TE
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2015 Sep; 232(17):3149-60. PubMed ID: 25980485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Individual variation in the attribution of incentive salience to social cues.
Fitzpatrick CJ; Morrow JD
Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2583. PubMed ID: 32054901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rats prone to attribute incentive salience to reward cues are also prone to impulsive action.
Lovic V; Saunders BT; Yager LM; Robinson TE
Behav Brain Res; 2011 Oct; 223(2):255-61. PubMed ID: 21507334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The lateral hypothalamus and orexinergic transmission in the paraventricular thalamus promote the attribution of incentive salience to reward-associated cues.
Haight JL; Campus P; Maria-Rios CE; Johnson AM; Klumpner MS; Kuhn BN; Covelo IR; Morrow JD; Flagel SB
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2020 Dec; 237(12):3741-3758. PubMed ID: 32852601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Individual variation in incentive salience attribution and accumbens dopamine transporter expression and function.
Singer BF; Guptaroy B; Austin CJ; Wohl I; Lovic V; Seiler JL; Vaughan RA; Gnegy ME; Robinson TE; Aragona BJ
Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Mar; 43(5):662-70. PubMed ID: 26613374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neurons of the Ventral Tegmental Area Encode Individual Differences in Motivational "Wanting" for Reward Cues.
Ferguson LM; Ahrens AM; Longyear LG; Aldridge JW
J Neurosci; 2020 Nov; 40(46):8951-8963. PubMed ID: 33046552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A cocaine context renews drug seeking preferentially in a subset of individuals.
Saunders BT; O'Donnell EG; Aurbach EL; Robinson TE
Neuropsychopharmacology; 2014 Nov; 39(12):2816-23. PubMed ID: 24896613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individual variation in the motivational and neurobiological effects of an opioid cue.
Yager LM; Pitchers KK; Flagel SB; Robinson TE
Neuropsychopharmacology; 2015 Mar; 40(5):1269-77. PubMed ID: 25425322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neural Activity in the Ventral Pallidum Encodes Variation in the Incentive Value of a Reward Cue.
Ahrens AM; Meyer PJ; Ferguson LM; Robinson TE; Aldridge JW
J Neurosci; 2016 Jul; 36(30):7957-70. PubMed ID: 27466340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sign- and goal-tracking score does not correlate with addiction-like behavior following prolonged cocaine self-administration.
Pohořalá V; Enkel T; Bartsch D; Spanagel R; Bernardi RE
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2021 Aug; 238(8):2335-2346. PubMed ID: 33950271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Addiction vulnerability and the processing of significant cues: Sign-, but not goal-, tracker perceptual sensitivity relies on cue salience.
Phillips KB; Sarter M
Behav Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 134(2):133-143. PubMed ID: 31916796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
