259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23658206)
1. Subcentimeter tumor lesion delineation for high-resolution 18F-FDG PET images: optimizing correction for partial-volume effects.
Wallstén E; Axelsson J; Sundström T; Riklund K; Larsson A
J Nucl Med Technol; 2013 Jun; 41(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 23658206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tumor delineation using PET in head and neck cancers: threshold contouring and lesion volumes.
Ford EC; Kinahan PE; Hanlon L; Alessio A; Rajendran J; Schwartz DL; Phillips M
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4280-8. PubMed ID: 17153406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Partial-volume correction in PET: validation of an iterative postreconstruction method with phantom and patient data.
Teo BK; Seo Y; Bacharach SL; Carrasquillo JA; Libutti SK; Shukla H; Hasegawa BH; Hawkins RA; Franc BL
J Nucl Med; 2007 May; 48(5):802-10. PubMed ID: 17475970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and Precision of Partial-Volume Correction in Oncological PET/CT Studies.
Cysouw MCF; Kramer GM; Hoekstra OS; Frings V; de Langen AJ; Smit EF; van den Eertwegh AJ; Oprea-Lager DE; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2016 Oct; 57(10):1642-1649. PubMed ID: 27230933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving the detection of small lesions using a state-of-the-art time-of-flight PET/CT system and small-voxel reconstructions.
Koopman D; van Dalen JA; Lagerweij MC; Arkies H; de Boer J; Oostdijk AH; Slump CH; Jager PL
J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Mar; 43(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25613334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PET based volume segmentation with emphasis on the iterative TrueX algorithm.
Knäusl B; Hirtl A; Dobrozemsky G; Bergmann H; Kletter K; Dudczak R; Georg D
Z Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 22(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 21251804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repeatability of
Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 18F-FDG-PET partial volume effect correction using a modified recovery coefficient approach based on functional volume and local contrast: physical validation and clinical feasibility in oncology.
Anouan KJ; Lelandais B; Edet-Sanson A; Ruan S; Vera P; Gardin I; Hapdey S
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Sep; 61(3):301-313. PubMed ID: 26407135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A gel tumour phantom for assessment of the accuracy of manual and automatic delineation of gross tumour volume from FDG-PET/CT.
Skretting A; Evensen JF; Løndalen AM; Bogsrud TV; Glomset OK; Eilertsen K
Acta Oncol; 2013 Apr; 52(3):636-44. PubMed ID: 23075421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimization of PET reconstruction algorithm, SUV thresholding algorithm and PET acquisition time in clinical 11C-acetate PET/CT.
Strandberg S; Hashemi A; Axelsson J; Riklund K
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0209169. PubMed ID: 30543705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental investigation of factors affecting the absolute recovery coefficients in iodine-124 PET lesion imaging.
Jentzen W
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Apr; 55(8):2365-98. PubMed ID: 20360631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Voxel-based comparison of state-of-the-art reconstruction algorithms for 18F-FDG PET brain imaging using simulated and clinical data.
Vunckx K; Dupont P; Goffin K; Van Paesschen W; Van Laere K; Nuyts J
Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 102 Pt 2():875-84. PubMed ID: 25008958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability of metabolically active volume measurements with 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT PET in non-small cell lung cancer.
Frings V; de Langen AJ; Smit EF; van Velden FH; Hoekstra OS; van Tinteren H; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2010 Dec; 51(12):1870-7. PubMed ID: 21078791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variability and uncertainty of 18F-FDG PET imaging protocols for assessing inflammation in atherosclerosis: suggestions for improvement.
Huet P; Burg S; Le Guludec D; Hyafil F; Buvat I
J Nucl Med; 2015 Apr; 56(4):552-9. PubMed ID: 25722452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Initial experience in small animal tumor imaging with a clinical positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanner using 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.
Tatsumi M; Nakamoto Y; Traughber B; Marshall LT; Geschwind JF; Wahl RL
Cancer Res; 2003 Oct; 63(19):6252-7. PubMed ID: 14559811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-Small cell lung cancer.
Nestle U; Kremp S; Schaefer-Schuler A; Sebastian-Welsch C; Hellwig D; Rübe C; Kirsch CM
J Nucl Med; 2005 Aug; 46(8):1342-8. PubMed ID: 16085592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Partial volume correction strategies for quantitative FDG PET in oncology.
Hoetjes NJ; van Velden FH; Hoekstra OS; Hoekstra CJ; Krak NC; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 Aug; 37(9):1679-87. PubMed ID: 20422184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lesion quantification in oncological positron emission tomography: a maximum likelihood partial volume correction strategy.
De Bernardi E; Faggiano E; Zito F; Gerundini P; Baselli G
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3040-9. PubMed ID: 19673203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel iterative method for lesion delineation and volumetric quantification with FDG PET.
van Dalen JA; Hoffmann AL; Dicken V; Vogel WV; Wiering B; Ruers TJ; Karssemeijer N; Oyen WJ
Nucl Med Commun; 2007 Jun; 28(6):485-93. PubMed ID: 17460540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel partial volume effects correction technique integrating deconvolution associated with denoising within an iterative PET image reconstruction.
Merlin T; Visvikis D; Fernandez P; Lamare F
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):804-19. PubMed ID: 25652494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
