These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23659912)

  • 21. ProDisc cervical arthroplasty does not alter facet joint contact pressure during lateral bending or axial torsion.
    Jaumard NV; Bauman JA; Guarino BB; Gokhale AJ; Lipschutz DE; Weisshaar CL; Welch WC; Winkelstein BA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jan; 38(2):E84-93. PubMed ID: 23132537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Motion analysis of bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial.
    Sasso RC; Best NM; Metcalf NH; Anderson PA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 18679092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Effects of artificial disc replacement with angles on stress of adjacent intervertebral disc].
    Bai CY; Zhang WJ; Wei WB; Ling W; Tian ZX; Dang XQ; Wang KZ
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2014 Sep; 27(9):756-61. PubMed ID: 25571659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Kinematics of progressive circumferential ligament resection (decompression) in conjunction with cervical disc arthroplasty in a spondylotic spine model.
    Roberto RF; McDonald T; Curtiss S; Neu CP; Kim K; Pennings F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Aug; 35(18):1676-83. PubMed ID: 20508554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement.
    Snyder JT; Tzermiadianos MN; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Rinella A; Dooris A; Carandang G; Renner SM; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2965-9. PubMed ID: 18091488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
    Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cervical spine biomechanics following implantation of a disc prosthesis.
    Galbusera F; Bellini CM; Raimondi MT; Fornari M; Assietti R
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Nov; 30(9):1127-33. PubMed ID: 18359659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Posterior facet load changes in adjacent segments due to moderate and severe degeneration in C5-C6 disc: a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model study.
    Hussain M; Natarajan RN; Chaudhary G; An HS; Andersson GB
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 22652989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
    Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments.
    Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Renner SM; Rosler DM; Ochoa JA; Patwardhan AG
    Spine J; 2009; 9(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 18440280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System: 3-dimensional kinematics.
    Zhu Q; Larson CR; Sjovold SG; Rosler DM; Keynan O; Wilson DR; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 17202893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel total cervical prosthesis in a single-level cervical subtotal corpectomy model: an in vitro human cadaveric study.
    Wu ZX; Han BJ; Zhao X; Kong L; Liu D; Cui G; Lei W
    J Surg Res; 2012 Jun; 175(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 21492873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion: a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion.
    Lee MJ; Dumonski M; Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov; 36(23):1932-9. PubMed ID: 21289581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Facet joint contact pressure is not significantly affected by ProDisc cervical disc arthroplasty in sagittal bending: a single-level cadaveric study.
    Bauman JA; Jaumard NV; Guarino BB; Weisshaar CL; Lipschutz DE; Welch WC; Winkelstein BA
    Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):949-59. PubMed ID: 22975463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
    Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces.
    Rousseau MA; Bradford DS; Bertagnoli R; Hu SS; Lotz JC
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 16651219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of the axial, antero-posterior and lateral positions of the center of rotation of a ball-and-socket disc prosthesis on the cervical spine biomechanics.
    Galbusera F; Anasetti F; Bellini CM; Costa F; Fornari M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Jun; 25(5):397-401. PubMed ID: 20149505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Adjacent-level range of motion and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Kretzer RM; Hsu W; Hu N; Umekoji H; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E778-85. PubMed ID: 22228326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go?
    Schwab JS; Diangelo DJ; Foley KT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):2439-48. PubMed ID: 17023853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro biomechanics of cervical disc arthroplasty with the ProDisc-C total disc implant.
    DiAngelo DJ; Foley KT; Morrow BR; Schwab JS; Song J; German JW; Blair E
    Neurosurg Focus; 2004 Sep; 17(3):E7. PubMed ID: 15636563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.