BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23660219)

  • 1. Transverse and sagittal angulations of proximal segment after sagittal split and vertical ramus osteotomies and their influence on the stability of distal segment.
    Pan JH; Lee JJ; Lin HY; Chen YJ; Jane Yao CC; Kok SH
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2013 May; 112(5):244-52. PubMed ID: 23660219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparisons of Jaw Line and Face Line after Mandibular Setback: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomies.
    Chen CM; Tseng YC; Ko EC; Chen MY; Chen KJ; Cheng JH
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():1375085. PubMed ID: 30662900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vertical ramus versus sagittal split osteotomies: comparison of stability after mandibular setback.
    Yoshioka I; Khanal A; Tominaga K; Horie A; Furuta N; Fukuda J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 66(6):1138-44. PubMed ID: 18486778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Change in condylar long axis and skeletal stability following sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathia.
    Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Oct; 63(10):1494-9. PubMed ID: 16182918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the quality of life changes of patients receiving sagittal split ramus osteotomy or intraoral vertical subsigmoid osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Wong NSM; Leung YY
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Apr; 27(4):1435-1448. PubMed ID: 36881158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postoperative stability of two common ramus osteotomy procedures for the correction of mandibular prognathism: A randomized controlled trial.
    Li DTS; Wang R; Wong NSM; Leung YY
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 50(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 34627665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrospective study of changes in the sensitivity of the oral mucosa: sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO).
    Hasegawa T; Tateishi C; Asai M; Imai Y; Okamoto N; Shioyasono A; Kimoto A; Akashi M; Suzuki H; Furudoi S; Komori T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 44(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 25468631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of mandibular setback via bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on transverse displacement of the proximal segment.
    Choi HS; Rebellato J; Yoon HJ; Lund BA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 63(7):908-16. PubMed ID: 16003615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contributing factors to intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment as a relapse factor after mandibular setback with sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Yang HJ; Hwang SJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 42(4):e57-63. PubMed ID: 23830770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The different effects of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) on mandibular border movement.
    Komori H; Kawanabe N; Kataoka T; Kato Y; Fujisawa A; Yamashiro T; Kamioka H
    Cranio; 2018 Jul; 36(4):228-233. PubMed ID: 28436308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical morbidities of sagittal split ramus osteotomy versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: a randomized clinical trial.
    Leung YY; Wang R; Wong NSM; Li DTS; Au SW; Choi WS; Su YX
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jul; 50(7):933-939. PubMed ID: 33168369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the skeletal stability after mandibular counter-clockwise rotation in three surgical procedures.
    Narahara S; Morita Y; Shido R; Yoshida N; Ohba S
    Odontology; 2024 Apr; 112(2):640-646. PubMed ID: 37880466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy and factors related to skeletal relapse.
    Chen CM; Lai SS; Wang CH; Wu JH; Lee KT; Lee HE
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Apr; 35(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 20871995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of osseous healing after sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
    Rokutanda S; Yamada S; Yanamoto S; Omori K; Fujimura Y; Morita Y; Rokutanda H; Kohara H; Fujishita A; Nakamura T; Yoshimi T; Yoshida N; Umeda M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1316-1321. PubMed ID: 29843949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement and its effect on relapse.
    Angle AD; Rebellato J; Sheats RD
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 65(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 17174764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postoperative stability of bimaxillary surgery in Class III patients with mandibular protrusion and mandibular deviation: a frontal cephalometric study.
    Al-Gunaid T; Yamada K; Takagi R; Saito C; Saito I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 37(11):992-8. PubMed ID: 18621507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Movement of the proximal segment after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy versus short lingual osteotomy with physiological positioning strategy.
    Ohba S; Tominaga J; Koga T; Miura KI; Yoshida N; Asahina I
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2020 Jul; 48(7):638-644. PubMed ID: 32439368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism: long-term stability.
    Chen CM; Lee HE; Yang CF; Shen YS; Huang IY; Tseng YC; Lai ST
    Ann Plast Surg; 2008 Jul; 61(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 18580150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transitional joint effusion in the mandibular prognathic surgery patient: intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Nishimura M; Segami N; Sato J; Honjou M; Fujimura K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 May; 62(5):545-8. PubMed ID: 15122556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interferences between mandibular proximal and distal segments in orthognathic surgery for patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism depending on different osteotomy techniques.
    Yang HJ; Lee WJ; Yi WJ; Hwang SJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 20382051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.