These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2366047)

  • 1. Representation of letters when mislocation errors occur.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1990 Apr; 117(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 2366047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings.
    Massaro DW; Venezky RL; Taylor GA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Mar; 108(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 528895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Interaction effects in the lateral visual field: an extension of Bouma's (1970) approach].
    Heller D; Huckauf A; Nazir T
    Z Exp Psychol; 1995; 42(3):386-418. PubMed ID: 8640479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facilitation in letter detection with sequentially presented homophonic strings.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1986 Jan; 113(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 3701306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Letter identification in words and non-words, with variation in visual angle and delay of position cue.
    Solman RT
    Perception; 1982; 11(3):305-17. PubMed ID: 7167339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Letter identification and lateral masking in dyslexic and average readers.
    Goolkasian P; King J
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(4):519-38. PubMed ID: 2275487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Types and tokens in visual letter perception.
    Mozer MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 May; 15(2):287-303. PubMed ID: 2525600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differential effects of concurrent letters on visual field differences in letter recognition.
    Hatta T
    Int J Neurosci; 1982 Sep; 17(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7166476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parafoveal identification asymmetry in a lateral masking effect.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1983 Jul; 109(1st Half):77-81. PubMed ID: 6619818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Masking by object substitution: dissociation of masking and cuing effects.
    Neill WT; Hutchison KA; Graves DF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):682-94. PubMed ID: 12075896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visually-presented letter strings typically are encoded phonologically: some converging evidence.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1987 Apr; 114(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 3585296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Asymmetries in perception of tachistoscopically presented horizontal and vertical random-letter strings.
    Webb RD; Fisher-Ingram L; Hope P
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Oct; 57(2):531-8. PubMed ID: 6634336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual and response interactions in semantic priming.
    Bernstein IH; Bissonnette V; Welch KR
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Dec; 48(6):525-34. PubMed ID: 2270184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orthographic regularity, lexical status, and letter-identification acuity.
    Hershenson M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Oct; 55(2):635-47. PubMed ID: 7155759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual and proprioceptive recognition of cursive letters in young children.
    Vinter A; Chartrel E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):147-56. PubMed ID: 18599004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phonological access to the mental lexicon in a target discrimination task.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1984 Jan; 110(1st Half):53-60. PubMed ID: 6699627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Durations of recognition for single letters, with and without visual masking, by dyslexics and normal readers.
    Grosser GS; Trzeciak GM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Dec; 53(3):991-5. PubMed ID: 7322794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A test of perceptual enhancement with peripherally presented letter pairs.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1990 Jul; 117(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 2213000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The word-superiority effect does not require a T-scope.
    Prinzmetal W
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):473-84. PubMed ID: 1594437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceiving exterior letters of words: differential influences of letter-fragment and non-letter-fragment masks.
    Jordon TR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Jun; 21(3):512-30. PubMed ID: 7790831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.