305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23661112)
1. Cost effectiveness of the NHS breast screening programme: life table model.
Pharoah PD; Sewell B; Fitzsimmons D; Bennett HS; Pashayan N
BMJ; 2013 May; 346():f2618. PubMed ID: 23661112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening women aged 65 years or over for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a modelling study and health economic evaluation.
Thompson SG; Bown MJ; Glover MJ; Jones E; Masconi KL; Michaels JA; Powell JT; Ulug P; Sweeting MJ
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Aug; 22(43):1-142. PubMed ID: 30132754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness and Benefit-to-Harm Ratio of Risk-Stratified Screening for Breast Cancer: A Life-Table Model.
Pashayan N; Morris S; Gilbert FJ; Pharoah PDP
JAMA Oncol; 2018 Nov; 4(11):1504-1510. PubMed ID: 29978189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Polygenic risk-tailored screening for prostate cancer: A benefit-harm and cost-effectiveness modelling study.
Callender T; Emberton M; Morris S; Eeles R; Kote-Jarai Z; Pharoah PDP; Pashayan N
PLoS Med; 2019 Dec; 16(12):e1002998. PubMed ID: 31860675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of Population-Wide Genomic Screening for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer in the United States.
Guzauskas GF; Garbett S; Zhou Z; Spencer SJ; Smith HS; Hao J; Hassen D; Snyder SR; Graves JA; Peterson JF; Williams MS; Veenstra DL
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Oct; 3(10):e2022874. PubMed ID: 33119106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography.
Stout NK; Rosenberg MA; Trentham-Dietz A; Smith MA; Robinson SM; Fryback DG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jun; 98(11):774-82. PubMed ID: 16757702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of breast MR imaging and screen-film mammography for screening BRCA1 gene mutation carriers.
Lee JM; McMahon PM; Kong CY; Kopans DB; Ryan PD; Ozanne EM; Halpern EF; Gazelle GS
Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 20177093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of MRI compared to mammography for breast cancer screening in a high risk population.
Moore SG; Shenoy PJ; Fanucchi L; Tumeh JW; Flowers CR
BMC Health Serv Res; 2009 Jan; 9():9. PubMed ID: 19144138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a Stratified National Breast Screening Program in the United Kingdom: An Early Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Gray E; Donten A; Karssemeijer N; van Gils C; Evans DG; Astley S; Payne K
Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1100-1109. PubMed ID: 28964442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Economic evaluation of the breast cancer screening programme in the Basque Country: retrospective cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis.
Arrospide A; Rue M; van Ravesteyn NT; Comas M; Soto-Gordoa M; Sarriugarte G; Mar J
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jun; 16():344. PubMed ID: 27251556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.
Schousboe JT; Kerlikowske K; Loh A; Cummings SR
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21727289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast cancer screening; cost-effective in practice?
De Koning HJ
Eur J Radiol; 2000 Jan; 33(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 10674787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lung cancer screening with helical computed tomography in older adult smokers: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Mahadevia PJ; Fleisher LA; Frick KD; Eng J; Goodman SN; Powe NR
JAMA; 2003 Jan; 289(3):313-22. PubMed ID: 12525232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative estimates of the impact of sensitivity and specificity in mammographic screening in Germany.
Warmerdam PG; de Koning HJ; Boer R; Beemsterboer PM; Dierks ML; Swart E; Robra BP
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1997 Apr; 51(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 9196649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.
Hristova L; Hakama M
Acta Oncol; 1997; 36 Suppl 9():1-60. PubMed ID: 9143316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benefit, Harm, and Cost-effectiveness Associated With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Before Biopsy in Age-based and Risk-stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer.
Callender T; Emberton M; Morris S; Pharoah PDP; Pashayan N
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Mar; 4(3):e2037657. PubMed ID: 33704474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of the Norwegian breast cancer screening program.
van Luijt PA; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
Int J Cancer; 2017 Feb; 140(4):833-840. PubMed ID: 27861849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Breast Cancer Screening Using Mammography in Singapore: A Modeling Study.
Chootipongchaivat S; Wong XY; Ten Haaf K; Hartman M; Tan KB; van Ravesteyn NT; Wee HL
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2021 Apr; 30(4):653-660. PubMed ID: 33531436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
