312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23661112)
21. Cost-effectiveness of Leveraging Social Determinants of Health to Improve Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.
Mohan G; Chattopadhyay S
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1434-1444. PubMed ID: 32556187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Incorporating Baseline Breast Density When Screening Women at Average Risk for Breast Cancer : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Shih YT; Dong W; Xu Y; Etzioni R; Shen Y
Ann Intern Med; 2021 May; 174(5):602-612. PubMed ID: 33556275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening.
Tosteson AN; Stout NK; Fryback DG; Acharyya S; Herman BA; Hannah LG; Pisano ED;
Ann Intern Med; 2008 Jan; 148(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18166758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cost-effectiveness of risk-based breast cancer screening programme, China.
Sun L; Legood R; Sadique Z; Dos-Santos-Silva I; Yang L
Bull World Health Organ; 2018 Aug; 96(8):568-577. PubMed ID: 30104797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in women on dialysis.
Wong G; Howard K; Chapman JR; Craig JC
Am J Kidney Dis; 2008 Nov; 52(5):916-29. PubMed ID: 18789566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cost-effectiveness of annual versus biennial screening mammography for women with high mammographic breast density.
Pataky R; Ismail Z; Coldman AJ; Elwood M; Gelmon K; Hedden L; Hislop G; Kan L; McCoy B; Olivotto IA; Peacock S
J Med Screen; 2014 Dec; 21(4):180-8. PubMed ID: 25186116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Mammography Beyond Age 75 Years : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Schousboe JT; Sprague BL; Abraham L; O'Meara ES; Onega T; Advani S; Henderson LM; Wernli KJ; Zhang D; Miglioretti DL; Braithwaite D; Kerlikowske K
Ann Intern Med; 2022 Jan; 175(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 34807717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Plevritis SK; Kurian AW; Sigal BM; Daniel BL; Ikeda DM; Stockdale FE; Garber AM
JAMA; 2006 May; 295(20):2374-84. PubMed ID: 16720823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cost effectiveness analysis of a polygenic risk tailored breast cancer screening programme in Singapore.
Wong JZY; Chai JH; Yeoh YS; Mohamed Riza NK; Liu J; Teo YY; Wee HL; Hartman M
BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Apr; 21(1):379. PubMed ID: 33892705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Long-Term Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Organized versus Opportunistic Screening for Breast Cancer in Austria.
Schiller-Fruehwirth I; Jahn B; Einzinger P; Zauner G; Urach C; Siebert U
Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1048-1057. PubMed ID: 28964436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cost-effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Population-based Breast Cancer Screening: A Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis.
Sankatsing VDV; Juraniec K; Grimm SE; Joore MA; Pijnappel RM; de Koning HJ; van Ravesteyn NT
Radiology; 2020 Oct; 297(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 32749212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews registry database analyses and economic evaluation.
Robertson C; Arcot Ragupathy SK; Boachie C; Dixon JM; Fraser C; Hernández R; Heys S; Jack W; Kerr GR; Lawrence G; MacLennan G; Maxwell A; McGregor J; Mowatt G; Pinder S; Ternent L; Thomas RE; Vale L; Wilson R; Zhu S; Gilbert FJ
Health Technol Assess; 2011 Sep; 15(34):v-vi, 1-322. PubMed ID: 21951942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The cost-effectiveness of screening for oral cancer in primary care.
Speight PM; Palmer S; Moles DR; Downer MC; Smith DH; Henriksson M; Augustovski F
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Apr; 10(14):1-144, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16707071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An economic evaluation of an abdominal aortic aneurysm screening program in Italy.
Giardina S; Pane B; Spinella G; Cafueri G; Corbo M; Brasseur P; Orengo G; Palombo D
J Vasc Surg; 2011 Oct; 54(4):938-46. PubMed ID: 21820837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Probabilistic cost-effectiveness modeling of different breast cancer screening policies in Slovenia.
Rojnik K; Naversnik K; Mateović-Rojnik T; Primiczakelj M
Value Health; 2008; 11(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 18380626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Modeling the Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Upper Age Limits for Breast Cancer Screening in England and Wales.
Rafia R; Brennan A; Madan J; Collins K; Reed MW; Lawrence G; Robinson T; Greenberg D; Wyld L
Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 27325332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy compared with second-generation endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding: the HEALTH RCT.
Cooper K; Breeman S; Scott NW; Scotland G; Hernández R; Clark TJ; Hawe J; Hawthorn R; Phillips K; Wileman S; McCormack K; Norrie J; Bhattacharya S
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Sep; 23(53):1-108. PubMed ID: 31577219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cost effectiveness of mammography screening for Chinese women.
Wong IO; Kuntz KM; Cowling BJ; Lam CL; Leung GM
Cancer; 2007 Aug; 110(4):885-95. PubMed ID: 17607668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Cost-effectiveness of multiple screening modalities on breast cancer in Chinese women from Shanghai].
Wu F; Mo M; Qin XX; Fang H; Zhao GM; Liu GY; Chen YY; Cao ZG; Yan YJ; Lyu LL; Xu WH; Shao ZM
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 38(12):1665-1671. PubMed ID: 29294584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quality-controlled mammography screening program from the Swiss statutory health-care perspective: quantitative assessment of the most influential factors.
Neeser K; Szucs T; Bulliard JL; Bachmann G; Schramm W
Value Health; 2007; 10(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 17261115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
