125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23661127)
1. A statistical model for the ultrasonic backscattered echo from tissue containing microcalcifications.
Shankar P
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 May; 60(5):932-42. PubMed ID: 23661127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistics of boundaries in ultrasonic B-scan images.
Shankar PM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):268-80. PubMed ID: 25438836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Noise-assisted correlation algorithm for suppressing noise-induced artifacts in ultrasonic Nakagami images.
Tsui PH; Yeh CK; Huang CC
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2012 May; 16(3):314-22. PubMed ID: 22155965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Artifact reduction of ultrasound Nakagami imaging by combining multifocus image reconstruction and the noise-assisted correlation algorithm.
Tsui PH; Tsai YW
Ultrason Imaging; 2015 Jan; 37(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 24626567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A general statistical model for ultrasonic backscattering from tissues.
Mohana Shankar P
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2000; 47(3):727-36. PubMed ID: 18238602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of frequency diversity and Nakagami statistics in ultrasonic tissue characterization.
Dumane VA; Shankar PM
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2001 Jul; 48(4):1139-46. PubMed ID: 11477773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imaging local scatterer concentrations by the Nakagami statistical model.
Tsui PH; Chang CC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 33(4):608-19. PubMed ID: 17343979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of the compound probability density function in ultrasonic tissue characterization.
Shankar PM
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(6):1007-15. PubMed ID: 15104323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discrimination of breast microcalcifications using a strain-compounding technique with ultrasound speckle factor imaging.
Liao YY; Li CH; Tsui PH; Chang CC; Kuo WH; Chang KJ; Yeh CK
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Jun; 61(6):955-65. PubMed ID: 24859659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of adaptive threshold filtering on ultrasonic nakagami parameter to detect variation in scatterer concentration.
Tsui PH; Wan YL; Huang CC; Wang MC
Ultrason Imaging; 2010 Oct; 32(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 21213568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microcalcifications versus artifacts: initial evaluation of a new ultrasound image processing technique to identify breast microcalcifications in a screening population.
Machado P; Eisenbrey JR; Cavanaugh B; Forsberg F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Sep; 40(9):2321-4. PubMed ID: 25023105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Method for Recovering Lost Ultrasonic Information Using the Echo-intensity Mean.
Bahramian S; Abbey CK; Insana MF
Ultrason Imaging; 2018 Sep; 40(5):283-299. PubMed ID: 29848216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Window-modulated compounding Nakagami imaging for ultrasound tissue characterization.
Tsui PH; Ma HY; Zhou Z; Ho MC; Lee YH
Ultrasonics; 2014 Aug; 54(6):1448-59. PubMed ID: 24835004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A compound scattering pdf for the ultrasonic echo envelope and its relationship to K and Nakagami distributions.
Shankar PM
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2003 Mar; 50(3):339-43. PubMed ID: 12699168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasonic tissue characterization using a generalized Nakagami model.
Shankar PM
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2001 Nov; 48(6):1716-20. PubMed ID: 11800135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Classification of ultrasonic B-mode images of breast masses using Nakagami distribution.
Shankar PM; Dumane VA; Reid JM; Genis V; Forsberg F; Piccoli CW; Goldberg BB
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2001 Mar; 48(2):569-80. PubMed ID: 11370371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Linear and nonlinear characterization of microbubbles and tissue using the Nakagami statistical model.
Bahbah N; Novell A; Bouakaz A; Djelouah H
Ultrasonics; 2017 Apr; 76():200-207. PubMed ID: 28119148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vibro-acoustic tissue mammography.
Fatemi M; Wold LE; Alizad A; Greenleaf JF
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jan; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11838661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A review of ultrasound detection methods for breast microcalcification.
Ouyang YL; Zhou ZH; Wu WW; Tian J; Xu F; Wu SC; Tsui PH
Math Biosci Eng; 2019 Mar; 16(4):1761-1785. PubMed ID: 31137184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automatic detection of microcalcifications in breast ultrasound.
Chang RF; Hou YL; Huang CS; Chen JH; Chang JM; Moon WK
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):102901. PubMed ID: 24089929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
