These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23661190)

  • 1. Memory as discrimination: what distraction reveals.
    Beaman CP; Hanczakowski M; Hodgetts HM; Marsh JE; Jones DM
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Nov; 41(8):1238-51. PubMed ID: 23661190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic cognitive control of irrelevant sound: Increased task engagement attenuates semantic auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Sörqvist P; Hughes RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1462-74. PubMed ID: 26191618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Erroneous and veridical recall are not two sides of the same coin: Evidence from semantic distraction in free recall.
    Marsh JE; Hughes RW; Sörqvist P; Beaman CP; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1728-40. PubMed ID: 25938326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensory Representations Supporting Memory Specificity: Age Effects on Behavioral and Neural Discriminability.
    Bowman CR; Chamberlain JD; Dennis NA
    J Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 39(12):2265-2275. PubMed ID: 30655350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A semantic mismatch effect on serial recall: Evidence for interlexical processing of irrelevant speech.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Körner U; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):515-525. PubMed ID: 29985037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    Cognition; 2009 Jan; 110(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 19081558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Boundaries of semantic distraction: dominance and lexicality act at retrieval.
    Marsh JE; Perham N; Sörqvist P; Jones DM
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1285-301. PubMed ID: 24993544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semantic and phonological information in sentence recall: converging psycholinguistic and neuropsychological evidence.
    Schweppe J; Rummer R; Bormann T; Martin RC
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2011 Dec; 28(8):521-45. PubMed ID: 22813068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distracted by relatives: Effects of frontal lobe damage on semantic distraction.
    Telling AL; Meyer AS; Humphreys GW
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):203-14. PubMed ID: 20621743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semantic priming by irrelevant speech.
    Röer JP; Körner U; Buchner A; Bell R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1205-1210. PubMed ID: 27798754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual differences in incorrect responding and the ability to discriminate the source of the products of retrieval.
    Jonker TR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1078-89. PubMed ID: 26727125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why star retrieves scar: Binding and retrieval of perceptual distractor features.
    Laub R; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Feb; 46(2):350-363. PubMed ID: 31180703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Closing the door to false memory: the effects of levels-of-processing and stimulus type on the rejection of perceptually vs. semantically dissimilar distractors.
    Nieznański M; Obidziński M
    Psychol Res; 2022 Apr; 86(3):968-982. PubMed ID: 34110472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The neural correlates of correctly rejecting lures during memory retrieval: the role of item relatedness.
    Bowman CR; Dennis NA
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jun; 233(6):1963-75. PubMed ID: 25862563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The process of auditory distraction: disrupted attention and impaired recall in a simulated lecture environment.
    Zeamer C; Fox Tree JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1463-72. PubMed ID: 23565786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. False memories through auditory distraction: When irrelevant speech produces memory intrusions in the absence of semantic interference.
    Kattner F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Mar; ():17470218241235654. PubMed ID: 38365601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of semantically related distractors during encoding and retrieval of words in long-term memory.
    Meade ME; Fernandes MA
    Memory; 2016 Jul; 24(6):801-11. PubMed ID: 26277934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?
    Grimaldi PJ; Karpicke JD
    Mem Cognit; 2012 May; 40(4):505-13. PubMed ID: 22238214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semantic information mediates visual attention during spoken word recognition in Chinese: Evidence from the printed-word version of the visual-world paradigm.
    Shen W; Qu Q; Li X
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1267-84. PubMed ID: 26993126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.