These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23662049)

  • 1. Patient satisfaction with the laborist model of care in a large urban hospital.
    Srinivas SK; Jesus AO; Turzo E; Marchiano DA; Sehdev HM; Ludmir J
    Patient Prefer Adherence; 2013; 7():217-22. PubMed ID: 23662049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variation in primary cesarean delivery rates by individual physician within a single-hospital laborist model.
    Metz TD; Allshouse AA; Gilbert SAB; Doyle R; Tong A; Carey JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):531.e1-531.e6. PubMed ID: 26922481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the impact of the laborist model of obstetric care on maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    Srinivas SK; Small DS; Macheras M; Hsu JY; Caldwell D; Lorch S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 215(6):770.e1-770.e9. PubMed ID: 27530491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Collaborative Laborist and Midwifery Model: An Accepted and Sustainable Model.
    Krolikowski-Ulmer K; Watson TJ; Westhoff EM; Ashmore SL; Thompson PA; Landeen LB
    S D Med; 2018 Dec; 71(12):534-537. PubMed ID: 30835985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do laborists improve delivery outcomes for laboring women in California community hospitals?
    Feldman DS; Bollman DL; Fridman M; Korst LM; El Haj Ibrahim S; Fink A; Gregory KD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):587.e1-587.e13. PubMed ID: 26026921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The laborist model of obstetric care: we need more evidence.
    Srinivas SK; Lorch SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jul; 207(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 22138138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implementation of a laborist program and evaluation of the effect upon cesarean delivery.
    Iriye BK; Huang WH; Condon J; Hancock L; Hancock JK; Ghamsary M; Garite TJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Sep; 209(3):251.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23904102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Midwife Laborist Model in a Collaborative Community Practice.
    Anil G; Hagen TM; Harkness LJ; Sousou CH
    Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes; 2020 Feb; 4(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 32055766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laborist model of care: who is using it?
    Srinivas SK; Shocksnider J; Caldwell D; Lorch S
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Mar; 25(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 21506656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a novel model for rural obstetric care.
    Orrantia E; Poole H; Strike J; Zelek B
    Can J Rural Med; 2010; 15(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 20070925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Evolution of the Laborist.
    Allen AJ; Caughey AB
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2017 Dec; 44(4):625-629. PubMed ID: 29078944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A National CERA Study of the Use of Laborists in Family Medicine Residency Training.
    Baldor RA; Pecci CC; Moreno G; Van Duyne V; Potts SE
    Fam Med; 2017 Feb; 49(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 28218936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors impacting Press Ganey patient satisfaction scores in orthopedic surgery spine clinic.
    Etier BE; Orr SP; Antonetti J; Thomas SB; Theiss SM
    Spine J; 2016 Nov; 16(11):1285-1289. PubMed ID: 27084192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Evolving Role of Midwives as Laborists.
    DeJoy SA; Sankey HZ; Dickerson AE; Psaltis A; Galli A; Burkman RT
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2015; 60(6):674-81. PubMed ID: 26619374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Potential Impact of Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospitalists on Safety of Obstetric Care.
    Srinivas SK
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2015 Sep; 42(3):487-91. PubMed ID: 26333638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of satisfaction with care in a midwifery unit and an obstetric unit: a randomized controlled trial of low-risk women.
    Bernitz S; Øian P; Sandvik L; Blix E
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Jun; 16(1):143. PubMed ID: 27316335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of patient telephone call after discharge on likelihood to recommend in an academic emergency department.
    Guss DA; Gray S; Castillo EM
    J Emerg Med; 2014 Apr; 46(4):560-6. PubMed ID: 24484625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maternal Depression Scale: Do "Drop-In" Laborist Patients Have Increased Postpartum Screening Risks Compared to Patients with Adequate Prenatal Care?
    Magliarditi AT; Lua LL; Kelley MA; Jackson DN
    Matern Child Health J; 2019 Jan; 23(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 30019156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictors of patient satisfaction and survey participation after spine surgery: a retrospective review of 17,853 consecutive spinal patients from a single academic institution. Part 1: Press Ganey.
    Hopkins BS; Patel MR; Yamaguchi JT; Cloney MB; Dahdaleh NS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Mar; 30(3):382-388. PubMed ID: 30611140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Childbirth-specific patient-reported outcomes as predictors of hospital satisfaction.
    Gregory KD; Korst LM; Saeb S; McCulloch J; Greene N; Fink A; Fridman M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 220(2):201.e1-201.e19. PubMed ID: 30403975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.