These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23663926)

  • 21. Perinatal lethal conditions: the effect of diagnosis on decision making.
    Hassed SJ; Miller CH; Pope SK; Murphy P; Quirk JG; Cunniff C
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jul; 82(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 8515923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. 'I want a choice, but I don't want to decide'--a qualitative study of pregnant women's experiences regarding early ultrasound risk assessment for chromosomal anomalies.
    Aune I; Möller A
    Midwifery; 2012 Feb; 28(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 21130549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Presenting and discussing nuchal translucency screening for fetal abnormality in the UK.
    Pilnick AM; Fraser DM; James DK
    Midwifery; 2004 Mar; 20(1):82-93. PubMed ID: 15020030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pregnancy interrupted: loss of a desired pregnancy after diagnosis of fetal anomaly.
    McCoyd JL
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Mar; 28(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 17454512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Experiences of prenatal diagnosis and decision-making about termination of pregnancy: A qualitative study.
    Hodgson J; Pitt P; Metcalfe S; Halliday J; Menezes M; Fisher J; Hickerton C; Petersen K; McClaren B
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Dec; 56(6):605-613. PubMed ID: 27402530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Seeing baby: women's experience of prenatal ultrasound examination and unexpected fetal diagnosis.
    Van der Zalm JE; Byrne PJ
    J Perinatol; 2006 Jul; 26(7):403-8. PubMed ID: 16801957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An evaluation of a shared experience group for women and their support persons following prenatal diagnosis and termination for a fetal abnormality.
    Gordon L; Thornton A; Lewis S; Wake S; Sahhar M
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Sep; 27(9):835-9. PubMed ID: 17600863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of a decision aid for prenatal testing of fetal abnormalities to improve women's informed decision making: a cluster randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN22532458].
    Nagle C; Gunn J; Bell R; Lewis S; Meiser B; Metcalfe S; Ukoumunne OC; Halliday J
    BJOG; 2008 Feb; 115(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 18190370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Fears of pregnant women if prenatal examination yields or does not yield any findings].
    Kowalcek I; Lammers C; Brunk J; Bieniakiewicz I; Gembruch U
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2002 Mar; 124(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12070797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Medical and ethical considerations in twin pregnancies discordant for serious cardiac disease.
    Malhotra A; Menahem S; Shekleton P; Gillam L
    J Perinatol; 2009 Oct; 29(10):662-7. PubMed ID: 19626028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Recasting Hope: a process of adaptation following fetal anomaly diagnosis.
    Lalor J; Begley CM; Galavan E
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(3):462-72. PubMed ID: 19026477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ultrasound screening during pregnancy in Iran: womens' expectations, experiences and number of scans.
    Ranji A; Dykes AK
    Midwifery; 2012 Feb; 28(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 21041007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Japanese women's attitudes towards routine ultrasound screening during pregnancy.
    Murakami K; Tsujino K; Sase M; Nakata M; Ito M; Kutsunugi S
    Nurs Health Sci; 2012 Mar; 14(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 22303983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Attitudes and expectations of pregnant women to routine ultrasonography in early pregnancy].
    Qvist I; Iversen M; Skajaa K
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Feb; 164(7):902-5. PubMed ID: 11881555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Do women grieve after terminating pregnancies because of fetal anomalies? A controlled investigation.
    Zeanah CH; Dailey JV; Rosenblatt MJ; Saller DN
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):270-5. PubMed ID: 8336876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Communication competence in ultrasound examination in pregnancy].
    Götzmann L; Romann C; Schönholzer SM; Klaghofer R; Zimmermann R; Buddeberg C
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2001; 41(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 11964508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Coping styles of pregnant women after prenatal ultrasound screening for fetal malformation.
    Brisch KH; Munz D; Bemmerer-Mayer K; Terinde R; Kreienberg R; Kächele H
    J Psychosom Res; 2003 Aug; 55(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 12932506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Management of couples following prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormalities].
    Langer M; Ringler M; Mazanek P
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1987 Mar; 47(3):186-9. PubMed ID: 3582925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Psychological aspects of ultrasound examinations during pregnancy].
    Schönholzer SM; Götzmann L; Zimmermann R; Buddeberg C
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2000; 40(3-4):119-24. PubMed ID: 11326154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Determinants of parental decision to abort or continue after non-aneuploid ultrasound-detected fetal abnormalities.
    Pryde PG; Isada NB; Hallak M; Johnson MP; Odgers AE; Evans MI
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jul; 80(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 1603497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.