291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23663987)
21. Review of randomized controlled trials: issues to consider when designing a trial.
Pandis N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):905-7. PubMed ID: 23726342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Publication bias of randomized controlled trials in emergency medicine.
Ospina MB; Kelly K; Klassen TP; Rowe BH
Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Jan; 13(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 16365332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis.
Lobo FS; Wagner S; Gross CR; Schommer JC
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Mar; 2(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17138506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Regulatory considerations in the design of comparative observational studies using propensity scores.
Yue LQ
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1272-9. PubMed ID: 23075022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interpretation of observational studies.
Polychronopoulou A; Pandis N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):815-7. PubMed ID: 25432264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Meta-analyses including data from observational studies.
O'Connor AM; Sargeant JM
Prev Vet Med; 2014 Feb; 113(3):313-22. PubMed ID: 24268538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
Ioannidis JP
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs.
Peters JL; Mengersen KL
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 19018929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. How to make sense of clinical research.
Wooten JM; Ross VM
RN; 2005 Jan; 68(1):22-7; quiz 28. PubMed ID: 15742745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Methodological issues of randomized controlled trials for the evaluation of reproductive health interventions.
Villar J; Carroli G
Prev Med; 1996; 25(3):365-75. PubMed ID: 8781015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1.
Jansen JP; Fleurence R; Devine B; Itzler R; Barrett A; Hawkins N; Lee K; Boersma C; Annemans L; Cappelleri JC
Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):417-28. PubMed ID: 21669366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. From randomized trials to registry studies: translating data into clinical information.
Brown ML; Gersh BJ; Holmes DR; Bailey KR; Sundt TM
Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med; 2008 Oct; 5(10):613-20. PubMed ID: 18679381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical trials methodology: randomization, intent-to-treat, and random-effects regression.
Atkins DC
Depress Anxiety; 2009; 26(8):697-700. PubMed ID: 19658122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Meta-analysis: when and how.
Imperiale TF
Hepatology; 1999 Jun; 29(6 Suppl):26S-31S. PubMed ID: 10386080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches.
Little RJ; Rubin DB
Annu Rev Public Health; 2000; 21():121-45. PubMed ID: 10884949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: publication bias perpetuated by meta-analyses.
Vaitkus PT; Brar C
Am Heart J; 2007 Feb; 153(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 17239689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Early extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: the Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials.
Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 58(6):543-9. PubMed ID: 15878467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Risk factors, confounding, and the illusion of statistical control.
Christenfeld NJ; Sloan RP; Carroll D; Greenland S
Psychosom Med; 2004; 66(6):868-75. PubMed ID: 15564351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
Finckh A; Tramèr MR
Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
