These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23663987)

  • 41. Diet and cancer: the disconnect between epidemiology and randomized clinical trials.
    Meyskens FL; Szabo E
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Jun; 14(6):1366-9. PubMed ID: 15941942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
    Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reasons for caution when evaluating health care interventions using non-randomised study designs.
    Reeves BC
    Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd; 2004 Aug; 11 Suppl 1():40-5. PubMed ID: 15353902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A meta-analytic approach to determine the state of the science on implant dentistry.
    Proskin HM; Jeffcoat RL; Catlin A; Campbell J; Jeffcoat MK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22 Suppl():11-8. PubMed ID: 18437789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cross-sectional studies.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):127-9. PubMed ID: 24975008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Re: Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
    Pereira C; Castilho E
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 169(6):783; author reply 783-4. PubMed ID: 19208724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Exploratory or analytic meta-analysis: should we distinguish between them?
    Anello C; Fleiss JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):109-16; discussion 117-8. PubMed ID: 7853037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Combining randomized and non-randomized evidence in clinical research: a review of methods and applications.
    Verde PE; Ohmann C
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Mar; 6(1):45-62. PubMed ID: 26035469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical trial design for orthodontists.
    Pandis N; Cobourne MT
    J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 40(2):93-103. PubMed ID: 23794689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Randomized and nonrandomized studies: complementary or competing?
    Pandis N; Tu YK; Fleming PS; Polychronopoulou A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):633-40. PubMed ID: 25439214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Bias in observational studies.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):542-3. PubMed ID: 24703294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Methods for the bias adjustment of meta-analyses of published observational studies.
    Doi SA; Barendregt JJ; Onitilo AA
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):653-7. PubMed ID: 22845171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Statistical trial designs and clinical practice: are they compatible?
    Punt CJ
    Onkologie; 2003 Dec; 26(6):518-9. PubMed ID: 14709922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. From observational studies to randomized trials: asking the right question at the right time.
    Neaton JD; Mugglin AS
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Aug; 33(8):517-9. PubMed ID: 16899092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Randomized clinical trial: myths around elementary statistical principles.
    Edler L; Kopp-Schneider A
    Onkologie; 2003 Dec; 26(6):551-6. PubMed ID: 14709929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Clinical trials: methodological requirements and interpretation].
    Windeler J; Lange S
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2009 Apr; 52(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 19322527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Why randomized interventional studies.
    La Caze A
    J Med Philos; 2013 Aug; 38(4):352-68. PubMed ID: 23856475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Is Propensity Score Analysis a Valid Surrogate of Randomization for the Avoidance of Allocation Bias?
    Torres F; Ríos J; Saez-Peñataro J; Pontes C
    Semin Liver Dis; 2017 Aug; 37(3):275-286. PubMed ID: 28847037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Standardized mean differences in individually-randomized and cluster-randomized trials, with applications to meta-analysis.
    White IR; Thomas J
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 16279136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Association between unreported outcomes and effect size estimates in Cochrane meta-analyses.
    Furukawa TA; Watanabe N; Omori IM; Montori VM; Guyatt GH
    JAMA; 2007 Feb; 297(5):468-70. PubMed ID: 17284696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.