264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23664312)
1. Patients' and professionals' barriers and facilitators to external cephalic version for breech presentation at term, a qualitative analysis in the Netherlands.
Rosman AN; Vlemmix F; Fleuren MA; Rijnders ME; Beuckens A; Opmeer BC; Mol BW; van Zwieten MC; Kok M
Midwifery; 2014 Mar; 30(3):324-30. PubMed ID: 23664312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Facilitators and barriers to external cephalic version for breech presentation at term among health care providers in the Netherlands: a quantitative analysis.
Rosman AN; Vlemmix F; Beuckens A; Rijnders ME; Opmeer BC; Mol BW; Kok M; Fleuren MA
Midwifery; 2014 Mar; 30(3):e145-50. PubMed ID: 24530121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementation of the external cephalic version in breech delivery. Dutch national implementation study of external cephalic version.
Vlemmix F; Rosman AN; Fleuren MA; Rijnders ME; Beuckens A; Haak MC; Akerboom BM; Bais JM; Kuppens SM; Papatsonis DN; Opmeer BC; van der Post JA; Mol BW; Kok M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2010 May; 10():20. PubMed ID: 20459717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A qualitative interview study exploring pregnant women's and health professionals' attitudes to external cephalic version.
Say R; Thomson R; Robson S; Exley C
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2013 Jan; 13():4. PubMed ID: 23324533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - External Cephalic Version and other Interventions to turn Breech Babies to Cephalic Presentation].
Ducarme G
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Jan; 48(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 31678503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation of external cephalic version in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study.
Vlemmix F; Rosman AN; te Hoven S; van de Berg S; Fleuren MA; Rijnders ME; Beuckens A; Opmeer BC; Mol BW; Kok M
Birth; 2014 Dec; 41(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 25288341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol].
Kuppens SM; Francois AM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Pop VJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A63. PubMed ID: 20132565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uptake of external cephalic version for term breech presentation: an Australian population study, 2002-2012.
Bin YS; Roberts CL; Nicholl MC; Ford JB
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jul; 17(1):244. PubMed ID: 28747173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Fewer caesarean sections for breech presentation following external cephalic version according to a protocol in a special office visit].
Kuppens SM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Huibers M; Franssen MJ; de Becker BM; Wijnen HA; Pop VJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Jun; 152(23):1323-8. PubMed ID: 18661859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An observational study of the success and complications of 2546 external cephalic versions in low-risk pregnant women performed by trained midwives.
Beuckens A; Rijnders M; Verburgt-Doeleman GH; Rijninks-van Driel GC; Thorpe J; Hutton EK
BJOG; 2016 Feb; 123(3):415-23. PubMed ID: 25639281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determinants of pain perception after external cephalic version in pregnant women.
Truijens SE; van der Zalm M; Pop VJ; Kuppens SM
Midwifery; 2014 Mar; 30(3):e102-7. PubMed ID: 24332750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. This baby is not for turning: Women's experiences of attempted external cephalic version.
Watts NP; Petrovska K; Bisits A; Catling C; Homer CS
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16(1):248. PubMed ID: 27561416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Delivery mode and neonatal outcome after a trial of external cephalic version (ECV): a prospective trial of vaginal breech versus cephalic delivery.
Reinhard J; Sänger N; Hanker L; Reichenbach L; Yuan J; Herrmann E; Louwen F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):663-8. PubMed ID: 23183715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mode of childbirth and neonatal outcome after external cephalic version: A prospective cohort study.
Rosman AN; Vlemmix F; Ensing S; Opmeer BC; Te Hoven S; Velzel J; de Hundt M; van den Berg S; Rota H; van der Post JA; Mol BW; Kok M
Midwifery; 2016 Aug; 39():44-8. PubMed ID: 27321719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Successful but limited use of external cephalic version in Auckland.
Wise MR; Sadler L; Ansell D
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 19032661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pregnant women's preferences and knowledge of term breech management, in an Australian setting.
Raynes-Greenow CH; Roberts CL; Barratt A; Brodrick B; Peat B
Midwifery; 2004 Jun; 20(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 15177862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Impact of the external cephalic version on the obstetrical prognosis in a team with a high success rate of vaginal delivery in breech presentation].
Coppola C; Mottet N; Mariet AS; Baeza C; Poitrey E; Bourtembourg A; Ramanah R; Riethmuller D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Oct; 45(8):859-865. PubMed ID: 27125381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors affecting the success of moxibustion in the management of a breech presentation as a preliminary treatment to external cephalic version.
Manyande A; Grabowska C
Midwifery; 2009 Dec; 25(6):774-80. PubMed ID: 19853333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of external cephalic version for breech pregnancy and mode of delivery for breech and twin pregnancy: a survey of Canadian practitioners.
Hutton EK; Hannah ME; Barrett J
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2002 Oct; 24(10):804-10. PubMed ID: 12399807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tocolysis for repeat external cephalic version in breech presentation at term: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.
Impey L; Pandit M
BJOG; 2005 May; 112(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 15842288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
