BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23664475)

  • 1. Hybridization of natural systems with advanced treatment processes for organic micropollutant removals: new concepts in multi-barrier treatment.
    Sudhakaran S; Maeng SK; Amy G
    Chemosphere; 2013 Jul; 92(6):731-7. PubMed ID: 23664475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Appropriate drinking water treatment processes for organic micropollutants removal based on experimental and model studies - a multi-criteria analysis study.
    Sudhakaran S; Lattemann S; Amy GL
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Jan; 442():478-88. PubMed ID: 23186618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combination of granular activated carbon adsorption and deep-bed filtration as a single advanced wastewater treatment step for organic micropollutant and phosphorus removal.
    Altmann J; Rehfeld D; Träder K; Sperlich A; Jekel M
    Water Res; 2016 Apr; 92():131-9. PubMed ID: 26849316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Viability of a low-pressure nanofilter in treating recycled water for water reuse applications: a pilot-scale study.
    Bellona C; Drewes JE
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3948-58. PubMed ID: 17582458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integrating organic micropollutant removal into tertiary filtration: Combining PAC adsorption with advanced phosphorus removal.
    Altmann J; Sperlich A; Jekel M
    Water Res; 2015 Nov; 84():58-65. PubMed ID: 26210030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Organic micropollutant removal from wastewater effluent-impacted drinking water sources during bank filtration and artificial recharge.
    Maeng SK; Ameda E; Sharma SK; Grützmacher G; Amy GL
    Water Res; 2010 Jul; 44(14):4003-14. PubMed ID: 20542313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Upgrading coagulation with hollow-fibre nanofiltration for improved organic matter removal during surface water treatment.
    Köhler SJ; Lavonen E; Keucken A; Schmitt-Kopplin P; Spanjer T; Persson K
    Water Res; 2016 Feb; 89():232-40. PubMed ID: 26689660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ozone and biofiltration as an alternative to reverse osmosis for removing PPCPs and micropollutants from treated wastewater.
    Lee CO; Howe KJ; Thomson BM
    Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(4):1005-14. PubMed ID: 22202904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reverse osmosis concentrate treatment via a PAC-MF accumulative countercurrent adsorption process.
    Zhao C; Gu P; Cui H; Zhang G
    Water Res; 2012 Jan; 46(1):218-26. PubMed ID: 22082527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Removal of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in potable reuse systems.
    Glover CM; Quiñones O; Dickenson ERV
    Water Res; 2018 Nov; 144():454-461. PubMed ID: 30071400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reverse osmosis followed by activated carbon filtration for efficient removal of organic micropollutants from river bank filtrate.
    Kegel FS; Rietman BM; Verliefde AR
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(10):2603-10. PubMed ID: 20453334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Removal of micropollutants in drinking water using UV-LED/chlorine advanced oxidation process followed by activated carbon adsorption.
    Yin R; Shang C
    Water Res; 2020 Oct; 185():116297. PubMed ID: 32818735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of ozonation and biologically enhanced activated carbon filtration on the composition of micropollutants in drinking water.
    Li WG; Qin W; Song Y; Zheng ZJ; Lv LY
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(33):33927-33935. PubMed ID: 30003486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Removal of trace organic micropollutants by drinking water biological filters.
    Zearley TL; Summers RS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(17):9412-9. PubMed ID: 22881485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adsorption uptake of synthetic organic chemicals by carbon nanotubes and activated carbons.
    Brooks AJ; Lim HN; Kilduff JE
    Nanotechnology; 2012 Jul; 23(29):294008. PubMed ID: 22743805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative treatment of stabilized landfill leachate: coagulation and activated carbon adsorption vs. electrochemical oxidation.
    Papastavrou C; Mantzavinos D; Diamadopoulos E
    Environ Technol; 2009 Dec; 30(14):1547-53. PubMed ID: 20183999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of residual organic macromolecules produced in biological wastewater treatment processes on removal of pharmaceuticals by NF/RO membranes.
    Kimura K; Iwase T; Kita S; Watanabe Y
    Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(15):3751-8. PubMed ID: 19564034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Remediation of inorganic arsenic in groundwater for safe water supply: a critical assessment of technological solutions.
    Mondal P; Bhowmick S; Chatterjee D; Figoli A; Van der Bruggen B
    Chemosphere; 2013 Jun; 92(2):157-70. PubMed ID: 23466274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How to dose powdered activated carbon in deep bed filtration for efficient micropollutant removal.
    Altmann J; Ruhl AS; Sauter D; Pohl J; Jekel M
    Water Res; 2015 Jul; 78():9-17. PubMed ID: 25898248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling micropollutant removal by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: considerations and challenges.
    Castaño Osorio S; Biesheuvel PM; Spruijt E; Dykstra JE; van der Wal A
    Water Res; 2022 Oct; 225():119130. PubMed ID: 36240724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.