These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23664797)

  • 1. Operator experience reduces the risk of second trimester amniocentesis-related adverse outcomes.
    Margioula-Siarkou C; Karkanaki A; Kalogiannidis I; Petousis S; Dagklis T; Mavromatidis G; Prapas Y; Prapas N; Rousso D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jul; 169(2):230-3. PubMed ID: 23664797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic mid trimester amniocentesis: how safe?
    Seeds JW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Aug; 191(2):607-15. PubMed ID: 15343248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pregnancy outcome following second-trimester amniocentesis: a case-control study.
    Müngen E; Tütüncü L; Muhcu M; Yergök YZ
    Am J Perinatol; 2006 Jan; 23(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 16450269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk factors for procedure-related fetal losses after mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis.
    Kong CW; Leung TN; Leung TY; Chan LW; Sahota DS; Fung TY; Lau TK
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Oct; 26(10):925-30. PubMed ID: 16838383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pregnancy loss rate after mid-trimester amniocentesis in twin pregnancies.
    Cahill AG; Macones GA; Stamilio DM; Dicke JM; Crane JP; Odibo AO
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 200(3):257.e1-6. PubMed ID: 19136086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Amniocentesis-related adverse outcomes according to placental location and risk factors for fetal loss after midtrimester amniocentesis.
    Kalogiannidis I; Prapa S; Dagklis T; Karkanaki A; Petousis S; Prapas Y; Prapas N
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2011; 38(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 21995155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal loss following second trimester amniocentesis. Who is at greater risk? How to counsel pregnant women?
    Theodora M; Antsaklis A; Antsaklis P; Blanas K; Daskalakis G; Sindos M; Mesogitis S; Papantoniou N
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(4):590-5. PubMed ID: 25747948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single-operator comparison of early and mid-second-trimester amniocentesis.
    Assel BG; Lewis SM; Dickerman LH; Park VM; Jassani MN
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 79(6):940-4. PubMed ID: 1579318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age-specific risk of fetal loss post second trimester amniocentesis: analysis of 5043 cases.
    Mazza V; Pati M; Bertucci E; Re C; Ranzi A; Percesepe A; Forabosco A; Volpe A
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Feb; 27(2):180-3. PubMed ID: 17238217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revisiting the fetal loss rate after second-trimester genetic amniocentesis: a single center's 16-year experience.
    Odibo AO; Gray DL; Dicke JM; Stamilio DM; Macones GA; Crane JP
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 111(3):589-95. PubMed ID: 18310360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Amniocentesis in twin pregnancies.
    Supadilokluck S; Tongprasert F; Tongsong T; Wanapirak C; Piyamongkol W; Sirichotiyakul S; Srisupundit K
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Aug; 280(2):207-9. PubMed ID: 19112573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis.
    Eddleman KA; Malone FD; Sullivan L; Dukes K; Berkowitz RL; Kharbutli Y; Porter TF; Luthy DA; Comstock CH; Saade GR; Klugman S; Dugoff L; Craigo SD; Timor-Tritsch IE; Carr SR; Wolfe HM; D'Alton ME
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 17077226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic amniocentesis in multiple pregnancy.
    Tóth-Pál E; Papp C; Beke A; Bán Z; Papp Z
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2004; 19(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 14764958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk for fetal loss and prematurity after 12,413 second trimester amniocenteses in a single center.
    Theodora M; Antsaklis A; Blanas K; Antsaklis P; Daskalakis G; Sindos M; Mesogitis S; Papantoniou N
    J Perinat Med; 2015 May; 43(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 25485612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual risk of fetal loss following routine second trimester amniocentesis: a controlled study of 20,460 cases.
    Kozlowski P; Knippel A; Stressig R
    Ultraschall Med; 2008 Apr; 29(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 17602371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic amniocentesis complications: is the incidence overrated?
    Nassar AH; Martin D; González-Quintero VH; Gómez-Marín O; Salman F; Gutierrez A; O'Sullivan MJ
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2004; 58(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 15178899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A single physician's experience with four thousand six hundred genetic amniocenteses.
    Horger EO; Finch H; Vincent VA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Aug; 185(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 11518880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Second-trimester amniocentesis vs. chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis in multiple gestations.
    Antsaklis A; Souka AP; Daskalakis G; Kavalakis Y; Michalas S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Nov; 20(5):476-81. PubMed ID: 12423485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis in twin pregnancy and the risk of fetal loss.
    Millaire M; Bujold E; Morency AM; Gauthier RJ
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2006 Jun; 28(6):512-8. PubMed ID: 16857119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes after second trimester amniocentesis between procedures performed by experts and non-experts.
    Wisetmongkolchai T; Tongprasert F; Srisupundit K; Luewan S; Traisrisilp K; Tongsong T; Jatavan P
    J Perinat Med; 2021 May; 49(4):474-479. PubMed ID: 33554581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.