These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Information-theoretical assessment of the performance of likelihood ratio computation methods. Ramos D; Gonzalez-Rodriguez J; Zadora G; Aitken C J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1503-18. PubMed ID: 23879526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring calibration of likelihood-ratio systems: A comparison of four metrics, including a new metric devPAV. Vergeer P; van Schaik Y; Sjerps M Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Apr; 321():110722. PubMed ID: 33684845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of lead isotopic ratios of glass objects with the aim of comparing them for forensic purposes. Martyna A; Sjastad KE; Zadora G; Ramos D Talanta; 2013 Feb; 105():158-66. PubMed ID: 23598003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 'Low' LRs obtained from DNA mixtures: On calibration and discrimination performance of probabilistic genotyping software. McCarthy-Allen M; Bleka Ø; Ypma R; Gill P; Benschop C Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Nov; 73():103099. PubMed ID: 39089059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Information-theoretical feature selection using data obtained by scanning electron microscopy coupled with and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer for the classification of glass traces. Ramos D; Zadora G Anal Chim Acta; 2011 Oct; 705(1-2):207-17. PubMed ID: 21962363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States. Paciorek CJ; Liu Y; Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring coherence of computer-assisted likelihood ratio methods. Haraksim R; Ramos D; Meuwly D; Berger CE Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Apr; 249():123-32. PubMed ID: 25698513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated face recognition in forensic science: Review and perspectives. Jacquet M; Champod C Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Feb; 307():110124. PubMed ID: 31927397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect? Allen D; Rixson L Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Numerical likelihood ratios outputted by LR systems are often based on extrapolation: When to stop extrapolating? Vergeer P; van Es A; de Jongh A; Alberink I; Stoel R Sci Justice; 2016 Dec; 56(6):482-491. PubMed ID: 27914556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian analysis of fingerprint, face and signature evidences with automatic biometric systems. Gonzalez-Rodriguez J; Fierrez-Aguilar J; Ramos-Castro D; Ortega-Garcia J Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Dec; 155(2-3):126-40. PubMed ID: 16226150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An empirical estimate of the precision of likelihood ratios from a forensic-voice-comparison system. Morrison GS; Zhang C; Rose P Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):59-65. PubMed ID: 21131149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--modelling within finger variability. Egli NM; Champod C; Margot P Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):189-95. PubMed ID: 16914278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lead isotope ratios for bullets, forensic evaluation in a Bayesian paradigm. Sjåstad KE; Lucy D; Andersen T Talanta; 2016 Jan; 146():62-70. PubMed ID: 26695235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bilingual language assessment: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. Dollaghan CA; Horner EA J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Aug; 54(4):1077-88. PubMed ID: 21106696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multi-element comparisons of tapes evidence using dimensionality reduction for calculating likelihood ratios. Gupta A; Martinez-Lopez C; Curran JM; Almirall JR Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Aug; 301():426-434. PubMed ID: 31229846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part I: Diagnosis. Report of a task force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Zhang W; Doherty M; Pascual E; Bardin T; Barskova V; Conaghan P; Gerster J; Jacobs J; Leeb B; Lioté F; McCarthy G; Netter P; Nuki G; Perez-Ruiz F; Pignone A; Pimentão J; Punzi L; Roddy E; Uhlig T; Zimmermann-Gòrska I; Ann Rheum Dis; 2006 Oct; 65(10):1301-11. PubMed ID: 16707533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]