249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23665088)
1. Endocervical glandular involvement, multicentricity, and extent of the disease are features of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Güdücü N; Sidar G; Başsüllü N; Türkmen I; Dünder I
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2013 Aug; 17(4):345-6. PubMed ID: 23665088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement.
Livasy CA; Maygarden SJ; Rajaratnam CT; Novotny DB
Mod Pathol; 1999 Mar; 12(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10102607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endocervical glandular involvement, positive endocervical surgical margin and multicentricity are more often associated with high-grade than low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Kır G; Karabulut MH; Topal CS; Yılmaz MS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1206-10. PubMed ID: 22540878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictors of recurrent/residual disease after loop electrosurgical excisional procedure.
Chikazawa K; Netsu S; Motomatsu S; Konno R
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Apr; 42(4):457-63. PubMed ID: 26786387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk factors for residual disease after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 and positive surgical margins.
Ayhan A; Tuncer HA; Reyhan NH; Kuscu E; Dursun P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():1-6. PubMed ID: 27038228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Analysis of recurrence and its influencing factors in patients with cervical HSIL within 24 months after LEEP].
Chen LM; Liu L; Tao X; He Y; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 54(8):534-540. PubMed ID: 31461810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (CIN 2 and 3) excised with negative margins by loop electrosurgical excision procedure: the significance of CIN 1 at the margins of excision.
Cardoza-Favarato G; Fadare O
Hum Pathol; 2007 May; 38(5):781-6. PubMed ID: 17316761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeat LEEP conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and positive ectocervical margins.
Ayhan A; Boynukalin FK; Guven S; Dogan NU; Esinler I; Usubutun A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Apr; 105(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 19111301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].
Liu L; Chen LM; Tao X; Dai F; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):751-756. PubMed ID: 29179270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical management of patients with positive excision margin after cervical conization: analysis of 148 cases].
Wang T; Kong WM; Li BZ; Wu YM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 May; 88(19):1331-4. PubMed ID: 18956703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interpretability of excisional biopsies of the cervix: cone biopsy and loop excision.
Miroshnichenko GG; Parva M; Holtz DO; Klemens JA; Dunton CJ
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 19098600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increase in the cervical length after the loop electrosurgical excision procedure for grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Chikazawa K; Netsu S; Akashi K; Suzuki Y; Konno R; Motomatsu S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Jan; 37(1):78-81. PubMed ID: 27924675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Residual lesions in uterine specimens after loop electrosurgical excision procedure in patients with CIN.
Jing L; Dan W; Zhunan L; Ying X; Yi C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Oct; 298(4):805-812. PubMed ID: 30167855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term outcomes of a loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a high incidence country.
Sangkarat S; Ruengkhachorn I; Benjapibal M; Laiwejpithaya S; Wongthiraporn W; Rattanachaiyanont M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(2):1035-9. PubMed ID: 24568447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significance of disease extent in high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia excised with negative margins by loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Fadare O; Cardoza-Favarato G
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Feb; 12(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 18164410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Significance of margin and extent of dysplasia in loop electrosurgery excision procedure biopsies performed for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in predicting persistent disease.
Tyler LN; Andrews N; Parrish RS; Hazlett LJ; Korourian S
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2007 Apr; 131(4):622-4. PubMed ID: 17425396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Two Step LEEP and Cold Conisation For Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions to Decrease Positive Surgical Margins.
Senol T; Polat M; Ozkaya E; Karateke A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(7):3317-20. PubMed ID: 27509969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of second pass in loop electrosurgical excisional procedure.
Kim K; Kang SB; Chung HH; Lee TS; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
J Korean Med Sci; 2009 Feb; 24(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 19270822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
