216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23666209)
1. Sequence comparative analysis using networks: software for evaluating de novo transcript assembly from next-generation sequencing.
Misner I; Bicep C; Lopez P; Halary S; Bapteste E; Lane CE
Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Aug; 30(8):1975-86. PubMed ID: 23666209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comprehensive evaluation of de novo transcriptome assembly programs and their effects on differential gene expression analysis.
Wang S; Gribskov M
Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(3):327-333. PubMed ID: 28172640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative analysis of de novo transcriptome assembly.
Clarke K; Yang Y; Marsh R; Xie L; Zhang KK
Sci China Life Sci; 2013 Feb; 56(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 23393031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PARRoT- a homology-based strategy to quantify and compare RNA-sequencing from non-model organisms.
Gan RC; Chen TW; Wu TH; Huang PJ; Lee CC; Yeh YM; Chiu CH; Huang HD; Tang P
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 19):513. PubMed ID: 28155708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimizing de novo transcriptome assembly from short-read RNA-Seq data: a comparative study.
Zhao QY; Wang Y; Kong YM; Luo D; Li X; Hao P
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Dec; 12 Suppl 14(Suppl 14):S2. PubMed ID: 22373417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combining independent de novo assemblies optimizes the coding transcriptome for nonconventional model eukaryotic organisms.
Cerveau N; Jackson DJ
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(1):525. PubMed ID: 27938328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bridger: a new framework for de novo transcriptome assembly using RNA-seq data.
Chang Z; Li G; Liu J; Zhang Y; Ashby C; Liu D; Cramer CL; Huang X
Genome Biol; 2015 Feb; 16(1):30. PubMed ID: 25723335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Challenges and advances for transcriptome assembly in non-model species.
Ungaro A; Pech N; Martin JF; McCairns RJS; Mévy JP; Chappaz R; Gilles A
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0185020. PubMed ID: 28931057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimization of de novo transcriptome assembly from next-generation sequencing data.
Surget-Groba Y; Montoya-Burgos JI
Genome Res; 2010 Oct; 20(10):1432-40. PubMed ID: 20693479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. De Novo Transcriptome Assembly in Polyploid Species.
Gutierrez-Gonzalez JJ; Garvin DF
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1536():209-221. PubMed ID: 28132153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benchmarking of de novo assembly algorithms for Nanopore data reveals optimal performance of OLC approaches.
Cherukuri Y; Janga SC
BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):507. PubMed ID: 27556636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. De novo transcriptome assembly with ABySS.
Birol I; Jackman SD; Nielsen CB; Qian JQ; Varhol R; Stazyk G; Morin RD; Zhao Y; Hirst M; Schein JE; Horsman DE; Connors JM; Gascoyne RD; Marra MA; Jones SJ
Bioinformatics; 2009 Nov; 25(21):2872-7. PubMed ID: 19528083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The aquatic animals' transcriptome resource for comparative functional analysis.
Chou CH; Huang HY; Huang WC; Hsu SD; Hsiao CD; Liu CY; Chen YH; Liu YC; Huang WY; Lee ML; Chen YC; Huang HD
BMC Genomics; 2018 May; 19(Suppl 2):103. PubMed ID: 29764375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. TransRate: reference-free quality assessment of de novo transcriptome assemblies.
Smith-Unna R; Boursnell C; Patro R; Hibberd JM; Kelly S
Genome Res; 2016 Aug; 26(8):1134-44. PubMed ID: 27252236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Transcript assembly and quality assessment].
Deng F; Jia X; Lai S; Liu Y; Chen S
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1271-8. PubMed ID: 26955705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative performance of transcriptome assembly methods for non-model organisms.
Huang X; Chen XG; Armbruster PA
BMC Genomics; 2016 Jul; 17():523. PubMed ID: 27464550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating characteristics of de novo assembly software on 454 transcriptome data: a simulation approach.
Mundry M; Bornberg-Bauer E; Sammeth M; Feulner PG
PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31410. PubMed ID: 22384018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study of de novo assembly and genome-guided assembly strategies for transcriptome reconstruction based on RNA-Seq.
Lu B; Zeng Z; Shi T
Sci China Life Sci; 2013 Feb; 56(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 23393030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimization of de novo transcriptome assembly from high-throughput short read sequencing data improves functional annotation for non-model organisms.
Haznedaroglu BZ; Reeves D; Rismani-Yazdi H; Peccia J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 13():170. PubMed ID: 22808927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of De Novo Transcriptome Assemblers and k-mer Strategies Using the Killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus.
Rana SB; Zadlock FJ; Zhang Z; Murphy WR; Bentivegna CS
PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153104. PubMed ID: 27054874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
