These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23666733)
1. Proteomics data exchange and storage: the need for common standards and public repositories. Jiménez RC; Vizcaíno JA Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1007():317-33. PubMed ID: 23666733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The HUPO proteomics standards initiative--easing communication and minimizing data loss in a changing world. Orchard S; Hermjakob H Brief Bioinform; 2008 Mar; 9(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 18065433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. mzIdentML: an open community-built standard format for the results of proteomics spectrum identification algorithms. Eisenacher M Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 696():161-77. PubMed ID: 21063947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spectra, chromatograms, Metadata: mzML-the standard data format for mass spectrometer output. Turewicz M; Deutsch EW Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 696():179-203. PubMed ID: 21063948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proteomic data exchange and storage: the need for common standards and public repositories. Orchard S; Jones P; Taylor C; Zhu W; Julian RK; Hermjakob H; Apweiler R Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 367():261-70. PubMed ID: 17185781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. From proteomics data representation to public data flow: a report on the HUPO-PSI workshop September 2011, Geneva, Switzerland. Orchard S; Albar JP; Deutsch EW; Eisenacher M; Binz PA; Martinez-Bartolomé S; Vizcaíno JA; Hermjakob H Proteomics; 2012 Feb; 12(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 22290802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Data standardization by the HUPO-PSI: how has the community benefitted? Orchard S; Hermjakob H Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 696():149-60. PubMed ID: 21063946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proteomics data collection (ProDaC): publishing and collecting proteomics data sets in public repositories using standard formats. Stephan C; Eisenacher M; Kohl M; Meyer HE Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 604():345-68. PubMed ID: 20013383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The mzQuantML data standard for mass spectrometry-based quantitative studies in proteomics. Walzer M; Qi D; Mayer G; Uszkoreit J; Eisenacher M; Sachsenberg T; Gonzalez-Galarza FF; Fan J; Bessant C; Deutsch EW; Reisinger F; Vizcaíno JA; Medina-Aunon JA; Albar JP; Kohlbacher O; Jones AR Mol Cell Proteomics; 2013 Aug; 12(8):2332-40. PubMed ID: 23599424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The HUPO proteomics standards initiative--overcoming the fragmentation of proteomics data. Hermjakob H Proteomics; 2006 Sep; 6 Suppl 2():34-8. PubMed ID: 17031794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PRIDE Inspector Toolsuite: Moving Toward a Universal Visualization Tool for Proteomics Data Standard Formats and Quality Assessment of ProteomeXchange Datasets. Perez-Riverol Y; Xu QW; Wang R; Uszkoreit J; Griss J; Sanchez A; Reisinger F; Csordas A; Ternent T; Del-Toro N; Dianes JA; Eisenacher M; Hermjakob H; Vizcaíno JA Mol Cell Proteomics; 2016 Jan; 15(1):305-17. PubMed ID: 26545397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. qcML: an exchange format for quality control metrics from mass spectrometry experiments. Walzer M; Pernas LE; Nasso S; Bittremieux W; Nahnsen S; Kelchtermans P; Pichler P; van den Toorn HW; Staes A; Vandenbussche J; Mazanek M; Taus T; Scheltema RA; Kelstrup CD; Gatto L; van Breukelen B; Aiche S; Valkenborg D; Laukens K; Lilley KS; Olsen JV; Heck AJ; Mechtler K; Aebersold R; Gevaert K; Vizcaíno JA; Hermjakob H; Kohlbacher O; Martens L Mol Cell Proteomics; 2014 Aug; 13(8):1905-13. PubMed ID: 24760958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. imzML: Imaging Mass Spectrometry Markup Language: A common data format for mass spectrometry imaging. Römpp A; Schramm T; Hester A; Klinkert I; Both JP; Heeren RM; Stöckli M; Spengler B Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 696():205-24. PubMed ID: 21063949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A posteriori quality control for the curation and reuse of public proteomics data. Foster JM; Degroeve S; Gatto L; Visser M; Wang R; Griss J; Apweiler R; Martens L Proteomics; 2011 Jun; 11(11):2182-94. PubMed ID: 21538885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Managing experimental data using FuGE. Jones AR; Lister AL Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 604():333-43. PubMed ID: 20013382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Making proteomics data accessible and reusable: current state of proteomics databases and repositories. Perez-Riverol Y; Alpi E; Wang R; Hermjakob H; Vizcaíno JA Proteomics; 2015 Mar; 15(5-6):930-49. PubMed ID: 25158685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proteomics data repositories: providing a safe haven for your data and acting as a springboard for further research. Vizcaíno JA; Foster JM; Martens L J Proteomics; 2010 Oct; 73(11):2136-46. PubMed ID: 20615486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Submitting proteomics data to PRIDE using PRIDE Converter. Barsnes H; Vizcaíno JA; Reisinger F; Eidhammer I; Martens L Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 694():237-53. PubMed ID: 21082439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recent developments in public proteomic MS repositories and pipelines. Mead JA; Bianco L; Bessant C Proteomics; 2009 Feb; 9(4):861-81. PubMed ID: 19212957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Current status of proteomic standards development. Orchard S; Taylor C; Hermjakob H; Zhu W; Julian R; Apweiler R Expert Rev Proteomics; 2004 Aug; 1(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 15966812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]