These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23666788)

  • 1. Background field removal using spherical mean value filtering and Tikhonov regularization.
    Sun H; Wilman AH
    Magn Reson Med; 2014 Mar; 71(3):1151-7. PubMed ID: 23666788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Background field removal technique using regularization enabled sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data with varying kernel sizes.
    Kan H; Kasai H; Arai N; Kunitomo H; Hirose Y; Shibamoto Y
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Sep; 34(7):1026-33. PubMed ID: 27114339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SHARP edges: recovering cortical phase contrast through harmonic extension.
    Topfer R; Schweser F; Deistung A; Reichenbach JR; Wilman AH
    Magn Reson Med; 2015 Feb; 73(2):851-6. PubMed ID: 24590869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comprehensive numerical analysis of background phase correction with V-SHARP.
    Özbay PS; Deistung A; Feng X; Nanz D; Reichenbach JR; Schweser F
    NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27259117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Background field removal technique based on non-regularized variable kernels sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Kan H; Arai N; Takizawa M; Omori K; Kasai H; Kunitomo H; Hirose Y; Shibamoto Y
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 52():94-101. PubMed ID: 29902566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Background field removal using a region adaptive kernel for quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain.
    Fang J; Bao L; Li X; van Zijl PCM; Chen Z
    J Magn Reson; 2017 Aug; 281():130-140. PubMed ID: 28595120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An iterative spherical mean value method for background field removal in MRI.
    Wen Y; Zhou D; Liu T; Spincemaille P; Wang Y
    Magn Reson Med; 2014 Oct; 72(4):1065-71. PubMed ID: 24254415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new susceptibility-weighted image reconstruction method for the reduction of background phase artifacts.
    Lee Y; Han Y; Park H
    Magn Reson Med; 2014 Mar; 71(3):1324-35. PubMed ID: 23674230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single-step quantitative susceptibility mapping with variational penalties.
    Chatnuntawech I; McDaniel P; Cauley SF; Gagoski BA; Langkammer C; Martin A; Grant PE; Wald LL; Setsompop K; Adalsteinsson E; Bilgic B
    NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27332141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SENSE reconstruction with nonlocal TV regularization.
    Liang D; Wang H; Ying L
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():1032-5. PubMed ID: 19965132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Background field removal for susceptibility mapping of human brain with large susceptibility variations.
    Fang J; Bao L; Li X; van Zijl PCM; Chen Z
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Mar; 81(3):2025-2037. PubMed ID: 30298547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Template-based B₁ inhomogeneity correction in 3T MRI brain studies.
    Castro MA; Yao J; Pang Y; Lee C; Baker E; Butman J; Evangelou IE; Thomasson D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Nov; 29(11):1927-41. PubMed ID: 20570765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noise-driven anisotropic diffusion filtering of MRI.
    Krissian K; Aja-Fernández S
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Oct; 18(10):2265-74. PubMed ID: 19546041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Whole brain susceptibility mapping using compressed sensing.
    Wu B; Li W; Guidon A; Liu C
    Magn Reson Med; 2012 Jan; 67(1):137-47. PubMed ID: 21671269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regularized sensitivity encoding (SENSE) reconstruction using Bregman iterations.
    Liu B; King K; Steckner M; Xie J; Sheng J; Ying L
    Magn Reson Med; 2009 Jan; 61(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 19097223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust reconstruction of B1 (+) maps by projection into a spherical functions space.
    Sbrizzi A; Hoogduin H; Lagendijk JJ; Luijten P; van den Berg CA
    Magn Reson Med; 2014 Jan; 71(1):394-401. PubMed ID: 23408494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Method to correct intensity inhomogeneity in MR images for atherosclerosis characterization.
    Salvado O; Hillenbrand C; Zhang S; Wilson DL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 May; 25(5):539-52. PubMed ID: 16689259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rigid body motion compensation for spiral projection imaging.
    Johnson KO; Robison RK; Pipe JG
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Mar; 30(3):655-65. PubMed ID: 21062678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Discussion and improvement methods of quantitative susceptibility mapping reconstruction].
    Guo H; Yu Z; Ma G; Li C
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 36(6):930-937. PubMed ID: 31875366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved elimination of phase effects from background field inhomogeneities for susceptibility weighted imaging at high magnetic field strengths.
    Rauscher A; Barth M; Herrmann KH; Witoszynskyj S; Deistung A; Reichenbach JR
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Oct; 26(8):1145-51. PubMed ID: 18524525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.