These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23668353)

  • 1. Mammographical mass detection and classification using local seed region growing-spherical wavelet transform (LSRG-SWT) hybrid scheme.
    Görgel P; Sertbas A; Ucan ON
    Comput Biol Med; 2013 Jul; 43(6):765-74. PubMed ID: 23668353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
    Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Classification of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses on Mammograms for Large Datasets using Core Vector Machines.
    Jebamony J; Jacob D
    Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(6):703-710. PubMed ID: 32723242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast cancer detection and classification in digital mammography based on Non-Subsampled Contourlet Transform (NSCT) and Super Resolution.
    Pak F; Kanan HR; Alikhassi A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Nov; 122(2):89-107. PubMed ID: 26206406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Efficient Approach for Automated Mass Segmentation and Classification in Mammograms.
    Dong M; Lu X; Ma Y; Guo Y; Ma Y; Wang K
    J Digit Imaging; 2015 Oct; 28(5):613-25. PubMed ID: 25776767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated diagnosis of mammogram images of breast cancer using discrete wavelet transform and spherical wavelet transform features: a comparative study.
    Ganesan K; Acharya UR; Chua CK; Min LC; Abraham TK
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Dec; 13(6):605-15. PubMed ID: 24000991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast cancer diagnosis in digitized mammograms using curvelet moments.
    Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Zagrouba E
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Sep; 64():79-90. PubMed ID: 26151831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mass Detection in Mammographic Images Using Wavelet Processing and Adaptive Threshold Technique.
    Vikhe PS; Thool VR
    J Med Syst; 2016 Apr; 40(4):82. PubMed ID: 26811073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of a novel mass detection algorithm in mammograms.
    Kozegar E; Soryani M; Minaei B; Domingues I
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2013; 9(4):592-600. PubMed ID: 24518702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel approach for detection and classification of mammographic microcalcifications using wavelet analysis and extreme learning machine.
    Malar E; Kandaswamy A; Chakravarthy D; Giri Dharan A
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Sep; 42(9):898-905. PubMed ID: 22871899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer aided detection system for micro calcifications in digital mammograms.
    Mohamed H; Mabrouk MS; Sharawy A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Oct; 116(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 24909786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decision support system for breast cancer detection using mammograms.
    Ganesan K; Acharya RU; Chua CK; Min LC; Mathew B; Thomas AK
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):721-32. PubMed ID: 23636749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterization of Architectural Distortion in Mammograms Based on Texture Analysis Using Support Vector Machine Classifier with Clinical Evaluation.
    Kamra A; Jain VK; Singh S; Mittal S
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):104-14. PubMed ID: 26138756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neighborhood Structural Similarity Mapping for the Classification of Masses in Mammograms.
    Rabidas R; Midya A; Chakraborty J
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2018 May; 22(3):826-834. PubMed ID: 28622679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fully automated gradient based breast boundary detection for digitized X-ray mammograms.
    Kus P; Karagoz I
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22118773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A statistical based feature extraction method for breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiresolution representation.
    Meselhy Eltoukhy M; Faye I; Belhaouari Samir B
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 22115076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of enhancement methods for mammograms with performance measures.
    Kurt B; Nabiyev VV; Turhan K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():486-90. PubMed ID: 25160232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
    Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A wavelet-based mammographic image denoising and enhancement with homomorphic filtering.
    Gorgel P; Sertbas A; Ucan ON
    J Med Syst; 2010 Dec; 34(6):993-1002. PubMed ID: 20703608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computerized decision support system for mass identification in breast using digital mammogram: a study on GA-based neuro-fuzzy approaches.
    Das A; Bhattacharya M
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2011; 696():523-33. PubMed ID: 21431593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.