These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23668725)

  • 1. Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analyses in periodontology and implant dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Liu J; Huda F; Atieh M
    J Periodontal Res; 2014 Apr; 49(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 23668725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading journals of periodontology and implant dentistry: a survey.
    Faggion CM; Giannakopoulos NN
    J Periodontol; 2012 Oct; 83(10):1251-6. PubMed ID: 22220771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of methodological tools for assessing the quality of studies in periodontology and implant dentistry: a systematic review.
    Faggion CM; Huda F; Wasiak J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):625-31. PubMed ID: 24666018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Atieh MA; Park S
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):883-8. PubMed ID: 23834263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The reporting quality of meta-analysis results of systematic review abstracts in periodontology and implant dentistry is suboptimal.
    Polychronopoulou A
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2014 Dec; 14(4):209-10. PubMed ID: 25488877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is the evaluation of risk of bias in periodontology and implant dentistry comprehensive? A systematic review.
    Faggion CM; Listl S; Alarcón MA
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 May; 42(5):488-94. PubMed ID: 25809114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reporting of sources of funding in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Atieh M; Zanicotti DG
    Br Dent J; 2014 Feb; 216(3):109-12. PubMed ID: 24504292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Risk of Bias on the Effect Size of Meta-Analytic Estimates in Randomized Controlled Trials in Periodontology and Implant Dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Wu YC; Scheidgen M; Tu YK
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0139030. PubMed ID: 26422698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reporting completeness of abstracts of systematic reviews published in leading dental specialty journals.
    Seehra J; Fleming PS; Polychronopoulou A; Pandis N
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2013 Apr; 121(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 23489893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
    Shea B; Boers M; Grimshaw JM; Hamel C; Bouter LM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jun; 6():27. PubMed ID: 16772030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement.
    Peters JP; Hooft L; Grolman W; Stegeman I
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136540. PubMed ID: 26317406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews.
    Moher D; Tetzlaff J; Tricco AC; Sampson M; Altman DG
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e78. PubMed ID: 17388659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic reviews in dentistry: Current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics.
    Bassani R; Pereira GKR; Page MJ; Tricco AC; Moher D; Sarkis-Onofre R
    J Dent; 2019 Mar; 82():71-84. PubMed ID: 30716451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Authors seldom report the most patient-important outcomes and absolute effect measures in systematic review abstracts.
    Agarwal A; Johnston BC; Vernooij RW; Carrasco-Labra A; Brignardello-Petersen R; Neumann I; Akl EA; Sun X; Briel M; Busse JW; Ebrahim S; Granados CE; Iorio A; Irfan A; Martínez García L; Mustafa RA; Ramirez-Morera A; Selva A; Solà I; Sanabrai AJ; Tikkinen KA; Vandvik PO; Zhang Y; Zazueta OE; Zhou Q; Schunemann HJ; Guyatt GH; Alonso-Coello P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 81():3-12. PubMed ID: 27555080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in dental specialty journals.
    Seehra J; Wright NS; Polychronopoulou A; Cobourne MT; Pandis N
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 13(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 23481004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Zhang J; Wang J; Han L; Zhang F; Cao J; Ma Y
    Nurs Outlook; 2015; 63(4):446-455.e4. PubMed ID: 26187084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reporting quality of systematic review abstracts in leading oral implantology journals.
    Kiriakou J; Pandis N; Fleming PS; Madianos P; Polychronopoulou A
    J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1181-7. PubMed ID: 24075952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of quality of abstracts of systematic reviews including meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in high-impact general medicine journals before and after the publication of PRISMA extension for abstracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bigna JJ; Um LN; Nansseu JR
    Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 5(1):174. PubMed ID: 27737710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality-assessed reviews of health care interventions and the database of abstracts of reviews of effectiveness (DARE). NHS CRD Review, Dissemination, and Information Teams.
    Petticrew M; Song F; Wilson P; Wright K
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(4):671-8. PubMed ID: 10645108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.