These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23669049)

  • 1. Perceptual categories enable pattern generalization in songbirds.
    Comins JA; Gentner TQ
    Cognition; 2013 Aug; 128(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 23669049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual classification based on the component structure of song in European starlings.
    Gentner TQ; Hulse SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jun; 107(6):3369-81. PubMed ID: 10875382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory temporal pattern learning by songbirds using maximal stimulus diversity and minimal repetition.
    Comins JA; Gentner TQ
    Anim Cogn; 2014 Sep; 17(5):1023-30. PubMed ID: 24526277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of auditory recognition learning on the perception of vocal features in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).
    Meliza CD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3115-23. PubMed ID: 22087940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Song recognition learning and stimulus-specific weakening of neural responses in the avian auditory forebrain.
    Thompson JV; Gentner TQ
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Apr; 103(4):1785-97. PubMed ID: 20107117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds.
    Gentner TQ; Fenn KM; Margoliash D; Nusbaum HC
    Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7088):1204-7. PubMed ID: 16641998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal scales of auditory objects underlying birdsong vocal recognition.
    Gentner TQ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1350-9. PubMed ID: 18681620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revisiting the syntactic abilities of non-human animals: natural vocalizations and artificial grammar learning.
    ten Cate C; Okanoya K
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2012 Jul; 367(1598):1984-94. PubMed ID: 22688634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How social experience shapes song representation in the brain of starlings.
    George I; Cousillas H
    J Physiol Paris; 2013 Jun; 107(3):170-7. PubMed ID: 23266573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory responses in the HVC of anesthetized starlings.
    George I; Cousillas H; Richard JP; Hausberger M
    Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 1047(2):245-60. PubMed ID: 15907813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanisms of song perception in oscine birds.
    Knudsen DP; Gentner TQ
    Brain Lang; 2010 Oct; 115(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 20471673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increased signal complexity improves the breadth of generalization in auditory perceptual learning.
    Brown DJ; Proulx MJ
    Neural Plast; 2013; 2013():879047. PubMed ID: 24349800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural systems for individual song recognition in adult birds.
    Gentner TQ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2004 Jun; 1016():282-302. PubMed ID: 15313781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory representations and memory in birdsong learning.
    Hahnloser RH; Kotowicz A
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2010 Jun; 20(3):332-9. PubMed ID: 20307967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A blueprint for vocal learning: auditory predispositions from brains to genomes.
    Wheatcroft D; Qvarnström A
    Biol Lett; 2015 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 26246333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simple rules can explain discrimination of putative recursive syntactic structures by a songbird species.
    van Heijningen CA; de Visser J; Zuidema W; ten Cate C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Dec; 106(48):20538-43. PubMed ID: 19918074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional differences in forebrain auditory regions during learned vocal recognition in songbirds.
    Gentner TQ; Hulse SH; Ball GF
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2004 Dec; 190(12):1001-10. PubMed ID: 15449092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal pattern processing in songbirds.
    Comins JA; Gentner TQ
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2014 Oct; 28():179-87. PubMed ID: 25201176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response biases in auditory forebrain regions of female songbirds following exposure to sexually relevant variation in male song.
    Gentner TQ; Hulse SH; Duffy D; Ball GF
    J Neurobiol; 2001 Jan; 46(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 11108615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual vocal recognition and the effect of partial lesions to HVc on discrimination, learning, and categorization of conspecific song in adult songbirds.
    Gentner TQ; Hulse SH; Bentley GE; Ball GF
    J Neurobiol; 2000 Jan; 42(1):117-33. PubMed ID: 10623906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.