These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23669672)

  • 1. Preprocessed cumulative reconstructor with domain decomposition: a fast wavefront reconstruction method for pyramid wavefront sensor.
    Shatokhina I; Obereder A; Rosensteiner M; Ramlau R
    Appl Opt; 2013 Apr; 52(12):2640-52. PubMed ID: 23669672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cumulative Reconstructor: fast wavefront reconstruction algorithm for Extremely Large Telescopes.
    Rosensteiner M
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2011 Oct; 28(10):2132-8. PubMed ID: 21979519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wavefront reconstruction for extremely large telescopes via CuRe with domain decomposition.
    Rosensteiner M
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2012 Nov; 29(11):2328-36. PubMed ID: 23201793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Convolution- and Fourier-transform-based reconstructors for pyramid wavefront sensor.
    Shatokhina I; Ramlau R
    Appl Opt; 2017 Aug; 56(22):6381-6390. PubMed ID: 29047838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fast minimum variance wavefront reconstruction for extremely large telescopes.
    Thiébaut E; Tallon M
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 May; 27(5):1046-59. PubMed ID: 20448771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revisiting the comparison between the Shack-Hartmann and the pyramid wavefront sensors via the Fisher information matrix.
    Plantet C; Meimon S; Conan JM; Fusco T
    Opt Express; 2015 Nov; 23(22):28619-33. PubMed ID: 26561131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring the centroid gain of a Shack-Hartmann quad-cell wavefront sensor by using slope discrepancy.
    van Dam MA
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2005 Aug; 22(8):1509-14. PubMed ID: 16134845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intensity-enhanced deep network wavefront reconstruction in Shack-Hartmann sensors.
    DuBose TB; Gardner DF; Watnik AT
    Opt Lett; 2020 Apr; 45(7):1699-1702. PubMed ID: 32235977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Depth-resolved wavefront aberrations using a coherence-gated Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor.
    Tuohy S; Podoleanu AG
    Opt Express; 2010 Feb; 18(4):3458-76. PubMed ID: 20389356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retinal adaptive optics imaging with a pyramid wavefront sensor.
    Brunner E; Shatokhina J; Shirazi MF; Drexler W; Leitgeb R; Pollreisz A; Hitzenberger CK; Ramlau R; Pircher M
    Biomed Opt Express; 2021 Oct; 12(10):5969-5990. PubMed ID: 34745716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between a model-based and a conventional pyramid sensor reconstructor.
    Korkiakoski V; Vérinaud C; Le Louarn M; Conan R
    Appl Opt; 2007 Aug; 46(24):6176-84. PubMed ID: 17712383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Real-time turbulence profiling with a pair of laser guide star Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors for wide-field adaptive optics systems on large to extremely large telescopes.
    Gilles L; Ellerbroek BL
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Nov; 27(11):A76-83. PubMed ID: 21045893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of CMOS Pixel and Electronic Circuitry in the Performance of a Hartmann-Shack Wavefront Sensor.
    Abecassis ÚV; de Lima Monteiro DW; Salles LP; de Moraes Cruz CA; Agra Belmonte PN
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Sep; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 30274297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Weighted Fried reconstructor and spatial-frequency response optimization of Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing.
    Li T; Gong M; Huang L; Qiu Y; Xue Q
    Appl Opt; 2012 Oct; 51(29):7115-23. PubMed ID: 23052093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laser guide star wavefront sensing for ground-layer adaptive optics on extremely large telescopes.
    Clare RM; Le Louarn M; Béchet C
    Appl Opt; 2011 Feb; 50(4):473-83. PubMed ID: 21283238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computational performance comparison of wavefront reconstruction algorithms for the European Extremely Large Telescope on multi-CPU architecture.
    Feng L; Fedrigo E; Béchet C; Brunner E; Pirani W
    Appl Opt; 2012 Jun; 51(16):3564-83. PubMed ID: 22695596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modulation-nonmodulation pyramid wavefront sensor with direct gradient reconstruction algorithm on the closed-loop adaptive optics system.
    Wang S; Wei K; Zheng W
    Opt Express; 2018 Aug; 26(16):20952-20964. PubMed ID: 30119402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonlinear wavefront reconstruction methods for pyramid sensors using Landweber and Landweber-Kaczmarz iterations.
    Hutterer V; Ramlau R
    Appl Opt; 2018 Oct; 57(30):8790-8804. PubMed ID: 30461858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fast iterative tomographic wavefront estimation with recursive Toeplitz reconstructor structure for large-scale systems.
    Ono YH; Correia C; Conan R; Blanco L; Neichel B; Fusco T
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2018 Aug; 35(8):1330-1345. PubMed ID: 30110295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Demonstration of real-time depth-resolved Shack-Hartmann measurements.
    Wang J; Podoleanu AG
    Opt Lett; 2012 Dec; 37(23):4862-4. PubMed ID: 23202071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.