These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23670226)

  • 1. Nonclinical parameters affecting primary cesarean rates in the United States.
    Haberman S; Saraf S; Zhang J; Landy HJ; Branch DW; Burkman R; Gregory KD; Ramirez MM; Bailit JL; Gonzalez-Quintero VH; Hibbard JU; Hoffman MK; Kominiarek M; Lu L; Van Veldhuisen P; Von Gruenigen V;
    Am J Perinatol; 2014 Mar; 31(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 23670226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model.
    MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
    Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18307481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hospital variation in cesarean delivery rates: contribution of individual and hospital factors in Florida.
    Sebastião YV; Womack L; Vamos CA; Louis JM; Olaoye F; Caragan T; Bubu OM; Detman LA; Curran JS; Sappenfield WM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):123.e1-123.e18. PubMed ID: 26292046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cesarean delivery in Native American women: are low rates explained by practices common to the Indian health service?
    Mahoney SF; Malcoe LH
    Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 16128970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality obstetric trauma indicators valid measures of hospital safety?
    Grobman WA; Feinglass J; Murthy S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):868-74. PubMed ID: 16949428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of maternal characteristics on cesarean delivery rates among U.S. Department of Defense healthcare beneficiaries, 1996-2002.
    Linton A; Peterson MR; Williams TV
    Birth; 2004 Mar; 31(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15015987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Racial disparities in outcomes of twin pregnancies: elective cesarean or trial of labor?
    Drassinower D; Timofeev J; Huang CC; Landy HJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Aug; 211(2):160.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24534184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of managed care enrollment on primary and repeat cesarean rates among U.S. Department of Defense health care beneficiaries in military and civilian hospitals worldwide, 1999-2002.
    Linton A; Peterson MR
    Birth; 2004 Dec; 31(4):254-64. PubMed ID: 15566337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.
    ; ; Caughey AB; Cahill AG; Guise JM; Rouse DJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 210(3):179-93. PubMed ID: 24565430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation in the Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Cesarean Delivery Rate.
    Pasko DN; McGee P; Grobman WA; Bailit JL; Reddy UM; Wapner RJ; Varner MW; Thorp JM; Leveno KJ; Caritis SN; Prasad M; Saade G; Sorokin Y; Rouse DJ; Blackwell SC; Tolosa JE;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 131(6):1039-1048. PubMed ID: 29742665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical case mix adjustment of cesarean delivery rates in U.S. military hospitals, 2002.
    Linton A; Peterson MR; Williams TV
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 15738031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variations in cesarean delivery for fetal distress.
    Hueston WJ; McClaflin RR; Claire E
    J Fam Pract; 1996 Nov; 43(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 8917145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of severity of illness on cesarean delivery rates in Washington State.
    Hitti J; Walker S; Benedetti TJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):474.e1-474.e5. PubMed ID: 28666693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Episiotomy in the United States: has anything changed?
    Frankman EA; Wang L; Bunker CH; Lowder JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 May; 200(5):573.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19243733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The epidemiology of labor induction: Arizona, 1997.
    Coonrod DV; Bay RC; Kishi GY
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1355-62. PubMed ID: 10871449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Site-to-site variation in the factors affecting cesarean section rates.
    Hueston WJ
    Arch Fam Med; 1995 Apr; 4(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 7711922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Infant and neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to women with "no indicated risk," United States, 1998-2001 birth cohorts.
    MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
    Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 16948717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal trends in the rates of trial of labor in low-risk pregnancies and their impact on the rates and success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
    Yeh J; Wactawski-Wende J; Shelton JA; Reschke J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 194(1):144. PubMed ID: 16389024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When are babies born: morning, noon, or night? Birth certificate data for 2013.
    Mathews TJ; Curtin S
    NCHS Data Brief; 2015 May; (200):200. PubMed ID: 25973999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.