These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Speech perception by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): the voiced-voiceless distinction. Dooling RJ; Okanoya K; Brown SD Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jul; 46(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 2755763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptual organization of acoustic stimuli by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): II. Vocal signals. Dooling RJ; Park TJ; Brown SD; Okanoya K; Soli SD J Comp Psychol; 1987 Dec; 101(4):367-381. PubMed ID: 3691060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Formant-frequency discrimination of synthesized vowels in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans. Henry KS; Amburgey KN; Abrams KS; Idrobo F; Carney LH J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):2073. PubMed ID: 29092534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discrimination of synthetic full-formant and sinewave/ra-la/continua by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Dooling RJ; Best CT; Brown SD J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Mar; 97(3):1839-46. PubMed ID: 7699165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceptual organization of acoustic stimuli by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): I. Pure tones. Dooling RJ; Brown SD; Park TJ; Okanoya K; Soli SD J Comp Psychol; 1987 Jun; 101(2):139-149. PubMed ID: 3608422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A multidimensional scaling analysis of vowel discrimination in humans and monkeys. Sinnott JM; Brown CH; Malik WT; Kressley RA Percept Psychophys; 1997 Nov; 59(8):1214-24. PubMed ID: 9401456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experience with speech sounds is not necessary for cue trading by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). Flaherty M; Dent ML; Sawusch JR PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177676. PubMed ID: 28562597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceptual organization of acoustic stimuli by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): III. Contact calls. Brown SD; Dooling RJ; O'Grady KE J Comp Psychol; 1988 Sep; 102(3):236-247. PubMed ID: 3180731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The perception of English and Spanish vowels by native English and Spanish listeners: a multidimensional scaling analysis. Fox RA; Flege JE; Munro MJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2540-51. PubMed ID: 7714272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phonological perception by birds: budgerigars can perceive lexical stress. Hoeschele M; Fitch WT Anim Cogn; 2016 May; 19(3):643-54. PubMed ID: 26914456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceptual differences between vowels located in a limited phonetic space. Kewley-Port D; Atal BS J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1726-40. PubMed ID: 2708689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Auditory-perceptual interpretation of the vowel. Miller JD J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 May; 85(5):2114-34. PubMed ID: 2659639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of syllable-final segment duration on the identification of synthetic speech continua by birds and humans. Welch TE; Sawusch JR; Dent ML J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2779-87. PubMed ID: 19894853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acoustic and perceptual categories of vocal elements in the warble song of budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). Tu HW; Smith EW; Dooling RJ J Comp Psychol; 2011 Nov; 125(4):420-30. PubMed ID: 22142040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Similarities of vowels in nonreverberant and reverberant fields. Nábĕlek AK; Letowski TR J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 May; 83(5):1891-9. PubMed ID: 3403805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Obtaining acoustic similarity measures from animals: a method for species comparisons. Okanoya K; Dooling RJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Apr; 83(4):1690-3. PubMed ID: 3372876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]