These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23676080)

  • 21. Representing object colour in language comprehension.
    Connell L
    Cognition; 2007 Mar; 102(3):476-85. PubMed ID: 16616075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Readers routinely represent implied object rotation: the role of visual experience.
    Wassenburg SI; Zwaan RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Sep; 63(9):1665-70. PubMed ID: 20845232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neural correlates of British sign language comprehension: spatial processing demands of topographic language.
    MacSweeney M; Woll B; Campbell R; Calvert GA; McGuire PK; David AS; Simmons A; Brammer MJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):1064-75. PubMed ID: 12419129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension?
    Pickering MJ; Garrod S
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Mar; 11(3):105-10. PubMed ID: 17254833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The interface between language and attention: prosodic focus marking recruits a general attention network in spoken language comprehension.
    Kristensen LB; Wang L; Petersson KM; Hagoort P
    Cereb Cortex; 2013 Aug; 23(8):1836-48. PubMed ID: 22763170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sentence comprehension and simulation of object temporary, canonical and stable affordances.
    Borghi AM; Riggio L
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():117-28. PubMed ID: 19073156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Aesthetic issues in spatial composition: effects of vertical position and perspective on framing single objects.
    Sammartino J; Palmer SE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):865-79. PubMed ID: 22428674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comprehension of spatial language in Williams syndrome: evidence for impaired spatial representation of verbal descriptions.
    Laing E; Jarrold C
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Sep; 21(9):689-704. PubMed ID: 17701756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
    Zhou X; Chen Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Egocentric reference in bidirectional readers as measured by the straight-ahead pointing task.
    Kazandjian S; Dupierrix E; Gaash E; Love IY; Zivotofsky AZ; De Agostini M; Chokron S
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1247():133-41. PubMed ID: 18973747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Selecting a reference object.
    Miller JE; Carlson LA; Hill PL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):840-50. PubMed ID: 21417510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Emotional valence of spoken words influences the spatial orienting of attention.
    Bertels J; Kolinsky R; Morais J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):264-78. PubMed ID: 20347063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perceptual asymmetries in greyscales: object-based versus space-based influences.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 21227410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How vision is shaped by language comprehension--top-down feedback based on low-spatial frequencies.
    Hirschfeld G; Zwitserlood P
    Brain Res; 2011 Mar; 1377():78-83. PubMed ID: 21192918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Object representations maintain attentional control settings across space and time.
    Schreij D; Olivers CN
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 19682674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The development of spatial category representations from 4 to 7 years.
    Farran EK; Atkinson L
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2016 Nov; 34(4):555-568. PubMed ID: 27297696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contingent attentional capture by conceptually relevant images.
    Wyble B; Folk C; Potter MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):861-71. PubMed ID: 23163786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gravity and hemineglect.
    Pizzamiglio L; Vallar G; Doricchi F
    Neuroreport; 1995 Dec; 7(1):370-1. PubMed ID: 8742490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number-space interactions.
    Gevers W; Santens S; Dhooge E; Chen Q; Van den Bossche L; Fias W; Verguts T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Feb; 139(1):180-90. PubMed ID: 20121318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Continuous visual cues trigger automatic spatial target updating in dynamic scenes.
    Meyerhoff HS; Huff M; Papenmeier F; Jahn G; Schwan S
    Cognition; 2011 Oct; 121(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 21726856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.