193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23676111)
41. Electrosynthesis of acetate from inorganic carbon (HCO
Hou X; Huang L; Zhou P; Tian F; Tao Y; Li Puma G
J Hazard Mater; 2019 Jun; 371():463-473. PubMed ID: 30875574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Impact analysis of operating conditions on carbon dioxide reduction in microbial electrosynthesis: Insight into the substance utilization and microbial response.
Li S; Zhang H; Zhang H; Li S; Xing F; Chen T; Duan L
Bioresour Technol; 2023 Dec; 390():129879. PubMed ID: 37866769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Competition between Methanogens and Acetogens in Biocathodes: A Comparison between Potentiostatic and Galvanostatic Control.
Molenaar SD; Saha P; Mol AR; Sleutels TH; Ter Heijne A; Buisman CJ
Int J Mol Sci; 2017 Jan; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 28106846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Research on the electrocatalytic reduction of CO
Hu N; Wang L; Liao M; Yin M
Bioelectrochemistry; 2021 Feb; 137():107672. PubMed ID: 33011637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Bringing High-Rate, CO2-Based Microbial Electrosynthesis Closer to Practical Implementation through Improved Electrode Design and Operating Conditions.
Jourdin L; Freguia S; Flexer V; Keller J
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Feb; 50(4):1982-9. PubMed ID: 26810392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Value-Added Products: The Electrocatalyst and Microbial Electrosynthesis.
Chen Z; Wang X; Liu L
Chem Rec; 2019 Jul; 19(7):1272-1282. PubMed ID: 30298975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Increasing methane content in biogas and simultaneous value added product recovery using microbial electrosynthesis.
Das S; Chatterjee P; Ghangrekar MM
Water Sci Technol; 2018 Mar; 77(5-6):1293-1302. PubMed ID: 29528317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Enhanced bio-electrochemical performance of microbially catalysed anode and cathode in a microbial electrosynthesis system.
Tahir K; Ali AS; Ghani AA; Hussain M; Kim B; Lim Y; Lee DS
Chemosphere; 2023 Mar; 317():137770. PubMed ID: 36621685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Enhanced bio-production from CO
Izadi P; Fontmorin JM; Lim SS; Head IM; Yu EH
Faraday Discuss; 2021 Jul; 230(0):344-359. PubMed ID: 34259692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Microbial electrosynthesis of acetate from CO
Zhang X; Arbour T; Zhang D; Wei S; Rabaey K
Environ Sci Ecotechnol; 2023 Jan; 13():100211. PubMed ID: 36419905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Resistance assessment of microbial electrosynthesis for biochemical production to changes in delivery methods and CO
Bian B; Xu J; Katuri KP; Saikaly PE
Bioresour Technol; 2021 Jan; 319():124177. PubMed ID: 33035863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. In situ hydrogen utilization for high fraction acetate production in mixed culture hollow-fiber membrane biofilm reactor.
Zhang F; Ding J; Shen N; Zhang Y; Ding Z; Dai K; Zeng RJ
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2013 Dec; 97(23):10233-40. PubMed ID: 24196583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. High efficiency microbial electrosynthesis of acetate from carbon dioxide by a self-assembled electroactive biofilm.
Song TS; Zhang H; Liu H; Zhang D; Wang H; Yang Y; Yuan H; Xie J
Bioresour Technol; 2017 Nov; 243():573-582. PubMed ID: 28704738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Insights into the genome structure of four acetogenic bacteria with specific reference to the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway.
Esposito A; Tamburini S; Triboli L; Ambrosino L; Chiusano ML; Jousson O
Microbiologyopen; 2019 Dec; 8(12):e938. PubMed ID: 31573151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Microbial electrosynthesis of acetate from CO
Dessì P; Buenaño-Vargas C; Martínez-Sosa S; Mills S; Trego A; Ijaz UZ; Pant D; Puig S; O'Flaherty V; Farràs P
Environ Sci Ecotechnol; 2023 Oct; 16():100261. PubMed ID: 37089695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. High-efficient acetate production from carbon dioxide using a bioanode microbial electrosynthesis system with bipolar membrane.
Xiang Y; Liu G; Zhang R; Lu Y; Luo H
Bioresour Technol; 2017 Jun; 233():227-235. PubMed ID: 28282609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Mo
Tian S; Wang H; Dong Z; Yang Y; Yuan H; Huang Q; Song TS; Xie J
Biotechnol Biofuels; 2019; 12():71. PubMed ID: 30976321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effect of the electric supply interruption on a microbial electrosynthesis system converting inorganic carbon into acetate.
Del Pilar Anzola Rojas M; Zaiat M; Gonzalez ER; De Wever H; Pant D
Bioresour Technol; 2018 Oct; 266():203-210. PubMed ID: 29982040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Microbial electrosynthesis of methane and acetate-comparison of pure and mixed cultures.
Hengsbach JN; Sabel-Becker B; Ulber R; Holtmann D
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2022 Jun; 106(12):4427-4443. PubMed ID: 35763070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. High-rate microbial electrosynthesis using a zero-gap flow cell and vapor-fed anode design.
Baek G; Rossi R; Saikaly PE; Logan BE
Water Res; 2022 Jul; 219():118597. PubMed ID: 35609490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
