143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23676349)
21. Investigation of the influence of image reconstruction filter and scan parameters on operation of automatic tube current modulation systems for different CT scanners.
Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Gentle DJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Mar; 163(4):521-30. PubMed ID: 25107439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dose reduction to anterior surfaces with organ-based tube-current modulation: evaluation of performance in a phantom study.
Duan X; Wang J; Christner JA; Leng S; Grant KL; McCollough CH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Sep; 197(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 21862813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A new technique to characterize CT scanner bow-tie filter attenuation and applications in human cadaver dosimetry simulations.
Li X; Shi JQ; Zhang D; Singh S; Padole A; Otrakji A; Kalra MK; Xu XG; Liu B
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6274-82. PubMed ID: 26520720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dose estimations for Iranian 11-year-old pediatric phantoms undergoing computed tomography examinations.
Akhlaghi P; Miri-Hakimabad H; Rafat-Motavalli L
J Radiat Res; 2015 Jul; 56(4):646-55. PubMed ID: 25972393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Radiation dose for body CT protocols: variability of scanners at one institution.
Jaffe TA; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Anderson-Evans C; Lowry C; Miller CM; Nelson RC; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1141-7. PubMed ID: 19770340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dose performance of a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner.
McCollough CH; Primak AN; Saba O; Bruder H; Stierstorfer K; Raupach R; Suess C; Schmidt B; Ohnesorge BM; Flohr TG
Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):775-84. PubMed ID: 17446525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners.
Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Tzedakis A; Papadakis A; Theocharopoulos N; Gourtsoyiannis N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6485-95. PubMed ID: 17951857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of skin exposure during cerebral CT perfusion studies on a phantom.
Suzuki S; Kidouchi T; Yamamoto A; Machida H; Takei R; Ibukuro K; Mehta D
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 80(3):851-5. PubMed ID: 20932701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The comparison of radiation dose between C-arm flat-detector CT (DynaCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT): a phantom study.
Bai M; Liu B; Mu H; Liu X; Jiang Y
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3577-80. PubMed ID: 21963617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Conversion factor for CT dosimetry to assess patient dose using a 256-slice CT scanner.
Mori S; Nishizawa K; Ohno M; Endo M
Br J Radiol; 2006 Nov; 79(947):888-92. PubMed ID: 16728413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A tomographic physical phantom of the newborn child with real-time dosimetry. II. Scaling factors for calculation of mean organ dose in pediatric radiography.
Staton RJ; Jones AK; Lee C; Hintenlang DE; Arreola MM; Williams JL; Bolch WE
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3283-9. PubMed ID: 17022223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluating the impact of scan settings on automatic tube current modulation in CT using a novel phantom.
Merzan D; Nowik P; Poludniowski G; Bujila R
Br J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 90(1069):20160308. PubMed ID: 27845559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Automatic exposure control in computed tomography--an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers.
Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 20429764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparative study of thoracic radiation doses from 64-slice cardiac CT.
Nickoloff EL; Alderson PO
Br J Radiol; 2007 Jul; 80(955):537-44. PubMed ID: 17704315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Concepts for dose determination in flat-detector CT.
Kyriakou Y; Deak P; Langner O; Kalender WA
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(13):3551-66. PubMed ID: 18552416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. INFLUENCE OF LOCALIZER AND SCAN DIRECTION ON THE DOSE-REDUCING EFFECT OF AUTOMATIC TUBE CURRENT MODULATION IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY.
Franck C; Bacher K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):136-42. PubMed ID: 27056145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Radiation dose for routine clinical adult brain CT: Variability on different scanners at one institution.
Jaffe TA; Hoang JK; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Lowry C; Ravin C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):433-8. PubMed ID: 20651201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of patient size on radiation dose for abdominal MDCT with automatic tube current modulation: phantom study.
Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Toth TL; Nguyen GT; Toncheva GI; DeLong DM; Yoshizumi TT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):W100-5. PubMed ID: 18212190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A new phantom developed to test the ATCM performance of chest CT scanners.
Yang Y; Zhuo W; Chen B; Lu S; Zhou P; Ren W; Liu H
J Radiol Prot; 2021 Jun; 41(2):. PubMed ID: 33862608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
