148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23676506)
1. GCSF with or without chemotherapy compared to Plerixafor with GCSF as salvage mobilization regimen in patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma: collection effectiveness and cost effectiveness analysis.
Abdel-Rahman F; Tuffaha HW; Sharma S; Jazar HA; Hussein N; Saad A; Al Rawi O; Hussein A
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2014 Apr; 20(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 23676506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pegfilgrastim- versus filgrastim-based autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in the setting of preemptive use of plerixafor: efficacy and cost analysis.
Costa LJ; Kramer C; Hogan KR; Butcher CD; Littleton AL; Shoptaw KB; Kang Y; Stuart RK
Transfusion; 2012 Nov; 52(11):2375-81. PubMed ID: 22404694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies including plerixafor in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients.
Tichopád A; Vítová V; Kořístek Z; Lysák D
J Clin Apher; 2013 Dec; 28(6):395-403. PubMed ID: 23922227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Plerixafor on-demand combined with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: significant improvement in peripheral blood stem cells mobilization and harvest with no increase in costs.
Milone G; Martino M; Spadaro A; Leotta S; Di Marco A; Scalzulli P; Cupri A; Di Martina V; Schinocca E; Spina E; Tripepi G
Br J Haematol; 2014 Jan; 164(1):113-23. PubMed ID: 24138497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness and cost analysis of "just-in-time" salvage plerixafor administration in autologous transplant patients with poor stem cell mobilization kinetics.
Li J; Hamilton E; Vaughn L; Graiser M; Renfroe H; Lechowicz MJ; Langston A; Prichard JM; Anderson D; Gleason C; Lonial S; Flowers CR; Kaufman JL; Waller EK
Transfusion; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2175-82. PubMed ID: 21492180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of chemo-free strategy with G-CSF plus plerixafor on demand versus intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF as PBSC mobilization in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: An Italian explorative cost Analysis.
Laszlo D; Marcacci GP; Martino M; Radice D; Rabascio C; Lucchetti B; Magarò A; Caime A; Menna S; Lionetti MT; Bertolini F
Transfus Apher Sci; 2020 Oct; 59(5):102819. PubMed ID: 32499108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A retrospective study of autologous stem cell mobilization to guide an immediate salvage protocol using plerixafor for patients who mobilize stem cells poorly.
Hay AE; Lawrie A; Robinson N; Dong B; Culligan DJ
J Clin Apher; 2013 Oct; 28(5):378-80. PubMed ID: 23483573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are we choosing mobilization regimens for autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma wisely: A single center comparison of GCSF+/-plerixafor vs cyclophosphamide/GCSF+/-plerixafor.
Yang C; Dehghani M; Hopman W; Bhella S
J Clin Apher; 2022 Aug; 37(4):348-353. PubMed ID: 35218068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Plerixafor: a review of its use in stem-cell mobilization in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma.
Keating GM
Drugs; 2011 Aug; 71(12):1623-47. PubMed ID: 21861545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the use of plerixafor in stem cell mobilisation - an economic analysis of the PHANTASTIC trial.
Martin AP; Richards S; Haycox A; Houten R; McLeod C; Braithwaite B; Clark JO; Bell J; Clark RE
J Clin Apher; 2016 Oct; 31(5):434-42. PubMed ID: 26415895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Plerixafor as first- and second-line strategies for autologous stem cell mobilization in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma.
Lor KW; Helmons PJ; Belew H; Lane JR; Ball ED
Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jul; 32(7):596-603. PubMed ID: 22760691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic factors for re-mobilization using plerixafor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with malignant lymphoma or multiple myeloma previously failing mobilization with G-CSF with or without chemotherapy: the Korean multicenter retrospective study.
Kim JS; Yoon DH; Park S; Yoon SS; Cho SG; Min CK; Lee JJ; Yang DH; Kwak JY; Eom HS; Kim WS; Kim H; Do YR; Moon JH; Lee J; Suh C
Ann Hematol; 2016 Mar; 95(4):603-11. PubMed ID: 26754633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization with "just-in-time" plerixafor approach is a cost-effective alternative to routine plerixafor use.
Veltri L; Cumpston A; Shillingburg A; Wen S; Luo J; Leadmon S; Watkins K; Craig M; Hamadani M; Kanate AS
Cytotherapy; 2015 Dec; 17(12):1785-92. PubMed ID: 26475754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Second time a charm? Remobilization of peripheral blood stem cells with plerixafor in patients who previously mobilized poorly despite using plerixafor as a salvage agent.
Yuan S; Nademanee A; Krishnan A; Kogut N; Shayani S; Wang S
Transfusion; 2013 Dec; 53(12):3244-50. PubMed ID: 23607889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor vs hyperfractionated CY plus G-CSF for autologous stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: effectiveness, safety and cost analysis.
Antar A; Otrock ZK; Kharfan-Dabaja MA; Ghaddara HA; Kreidieh N; Mahfouz R; Bazarbachi A
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2015 Jun; 50(6):813-7. PubMed ID: 25751646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Plerixafor in combination with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor after chemotherapy increases mobilization efficiency in patients with lymphoma or myeloma: results of a Phase II clinical trial.
Jagirdar N; Harvey RD; Nooka A; Flowers C; Kaufman J; Lonial S; Lechowicz MJ; Langston A; Lipscomb C; Gaylor C; Waller EK
Transfusion; 2015 Oct; 55(10):2351-7. PubMed ID: 26331348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Dutch guideline for just-in-time addition of plerixafor to stem cell mobilization in patients who fail with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor.
Bilgin YM; Visser O; Beckers EA; te Boome LC; Huisman C; Ypma PF; Croockewit AJ; Netelenbos T; Kramer EP; de Greef GE
Transfusion; 2015 May; 55(5):1021-7. PubMed ID: 25641128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Plerixafor and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma previously failing mobilization with G-CSF with or without chemotherapy for autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization: the Austrian experience on a named patient program.
Worel N; Rosskopf K; Neumeister P; Kasparu H; Nachbaur D; Russ G; Namberger K; Witt V; Schloegl E; Zojer N; Linkesch W; Kalhs P; Greinix HT
Transfusion; 2011 May; 51(5):968-75. PubMed ID: 20880037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety and preliminary efficacy of plerixafor (Mozobil) in combination with chemotherapy and G-CSF: an open-label, multicenter, exploratory trial in patients with multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma undergoing stem cell mobilization.
Dugan MJ; Maziarz RT; Bensinger WI; Nademanee A; Liesveld J; Badel K; Dehner C; Gibney C; Bridger G; Calandra G
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2010 Jan; 45(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 19483760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An algorithm for utilizing peripheral blood CD34 count as a predictor of the need for plerixafor in autologous stem cell mobilization--cost-effectiveness analysis.
Abusin GA; Abu-Arja RF; Gingrich RD; Silverman MD; Zamba GK; Schlueter AJ
J Clin Apher; 2013 Aug; 28(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 23426644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
