These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23678023)

  • 41. Civil, sensible, and constructive peer review in APS journals.
    Raff H; Brown D
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2013 Sep; 37(3):211-2. PubMed ID: 24022765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Science and scholarship: ten volumes of the Journal Hospital Medicine.
    Auerbach A
    J Hosp Med; 2015 Jan; 10(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 25470813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Refereed journals.
    Shaughnessy AF
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1989; 2(4):292-3. PubMed ID: 2801200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Looking to and nurturing the future of physiology.
    Barrett KE
    J Physiol; 2017 Dec; 595(24):7263-7264. PubMed ID: 29164626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Our peer-review practice and strategies to improve journal scientific performance].
    Kudaiberdieva G
    Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2010 Oct; 10(5):389-90. PubMed ID: 20929692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Responding to, and learning from, peer review feedback.
    Smith J; Milnes L
    Nurs Child Young People; 2016 Nov; 28(9):18. PubMed ID: 27820998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. SfN Journals: Two Paths, One Goal: Sharing Strong Science.
    Bernard C; Picciotto M
    eNeuro; 2016; 3(4):. PubMed ID: 27419219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Open access to the scientific journal literature.
    Suber P
    J Biol; 2002; 1(1):3. PubMed ID: 12144706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Predatory journals: Authors and readers beware.
    Vakil C
    Can Fam Physician; 2019 Feb; 65(2):92-94. PubMed ID: 30765346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. NIH gathers information on peer review.
    Physiologist; 2007 Apr; 50(2):68. PubMed ID: 17477020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Journals' instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines.
    Malički M; Aalbersberg IJ; Bouter L; Ter Riet G
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222157. PubMed ID: 31487331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Trends in scientific publishing: Dark clouds loom large.
    Vinny PW; Vishnu VY; Lal V
    J Neurol Sci; 2016 Apr; 363():119-20. PubMed ID: 27000235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. How to evaluate and acknowledge a scientific journal peer reviewer: a proposed index to measure the performance of reviewers.
    Messias AMV; Lira RPC; Furtado JMF; Paula JS; Rocha EM
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2017; 80(6):V. PubMed ID: 29267566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Evaluation of social relevance of applied health research: a rough indicator may be the significance of publishing in national professional journals].
    Bouter LM; Knottnerus JA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(24):1178-83. PubMed ID: 10876699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Peer review of biomedical manuscripts: an update.
    Ludbrook J
    J Clin Neurosci; 2003 Sep; 10(5):540-2. PubMed ID: 12948455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. APSselect: Year One a Success!
    Metzger JM; Samuelson LC
    Physiologist; 2015 Jul; 58(4):188-90. PubMed ID: 26434156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The editorial process for medical journals: I. Introduction of a series and discussion of the responsibilities of editors, authors, and reviewers.
    Liesegang TJ; Albert DM; Schachat AP; Minckler DS
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jul; 136(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 12834678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The evolution of peer-reviewed papers.
    Rönnegård L
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Mar; 136(2):77-78. PubMed ID: 30773713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Peer review.
    Felton G; Swanson EA
    J Prof Nurs; 1995; 11(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 7844277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The peer-review process.
    Pearson GS
    Perspect Psychiatr Care; 2014 Apr; 50(2):77-8. PubMed ID: 24689488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.