249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23678999)
1. Torque efficiency of different archwires in 0.018- and 0.022-inch conventional brackets.
Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Katsaros C; Bourauel C
Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 23678999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Torque efficiency of square and rectangular archwires into 0.018 and 0.022 in. conventional brackets.
Papageorgiou SN; Sifakakis I; Doulis I; Eliades T; Bourauel C
Prog Orthod; 2016; 17():5. PubMed ID: 26780465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Torque expression of 0.018 and 0.022 inch conventional brackets.
Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Katsaros C; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Oct; 35(5):610-4. PubMed ID: 22828075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Torque expression in stainless steel orthodontic brackets. A systematic review.
Archambault A; Lacoursiere R; Badawi H; Major PW; Carey J; Flores-Mir C
Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):201-10. PubMed ID: 19852662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical analysis of the improved superelastic Ni-Ti alloy wire using the orthodontic simulator with high-precision sensors.
Mikami N; Yonemitsu I; Takemura H; Kondou M; Soga K; Suga K; Kanno Z; Lai W; Uo M; Ono T
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Jun; 142():105861. PubMed ID: 37146519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of the static and kinetic frictional resistance of titanium molybdenum alloy archwires in stainless steel brackets.
Cash A; Curtis R; Garrigia-Majo D; McDonald F
Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 14994890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new elastic slot system and V-wire mechanics.
Wichelhaus A
Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):774-781. PubMed ID: 28530449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does the design of self-ligating brackets show different behavior in terms of friction?
Tecco S; Marzo G; Di Bisceglie B; Crincoli V; Tetè S; Festa F
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 22299106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative assessment of the forces and moments generated at the maxillary incisors between conventional and self-ligating brackets using a reverse curve of Spee NiTi archwire.
Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Bourauel C
Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 21175021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Actual versus theoretical torsional play in conventional and self-ligating bracket systems.
Dalstra M; Eriksen H; Bergamini C; Melsen B
J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 42(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 25588827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite element analysis of slot wall deformation in stainless steel and titanium orthodontic brackets during simulated palatal root torque.
Magesh V; Harikrishnan P; Kingsly Jeba Singh D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):481-488. PubMed ID: 29602339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of galvanic corrosion potential of metal injection molded brackets to that of conventional metal brackets with nickel-titanium and copper nickel-titanium archwire combinations.
Varma DP; Chidambaram S; Reddy KB; Vijay M; Ravindranath D; Prasad MR
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):488-95. PubMed ID: 24171995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Torque capacity of metal and polycarbonate brackets with and without a metal slot.
Harzer W; Bourauel C; Gmyrek H
Eur J Orthod; 2004 Aug; 26(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 15366389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative experimental investigation of torque capabilities induced by conventional and active, passive self-ligating brackets.
Katsikogianni EN; Reimann S; Weber A; Karp J; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Aug; 37(4):440-6. PubMed ID: 25414477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study of biomechanical effects between two types of 2 × 4 techniques employing a rocking-chair archwire: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Wang S; Hu M; Wang S; Qi H; Song D; Jiang H
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Aug; 27(8):4617-4631. PubMed ID: 37294355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relative kinetic frictional forces between sintered stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires.
Vaughan JL; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS; Currier GF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jan; 107(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 7817958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of deformation and torque expression of the orthos and orthos Ti bracket systems.
Melenka GW; Lacoursiere RA; Carey JP; Nobes DS; Heo G; Major PW
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Aug; 36(4):381-8. PubMed ID: 22015820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of torque expression between stainless steel, titanium molybdenum alloy, and copper nickel titanium wires in metallic self-ligating brackets.
Archambault A; Major TW; Carey JP; Heo G; Badawi H; Major PW
Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):884-9. PubMed ID: 20578859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of third-order torque on frictional force of self-ligating brackets.
Muguruma T; Iijima M; Brantley WA; Ahluwalia KS; Kohda N; Mizoguchi I
Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):1054-61. PubMed ID: 24738791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
