These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23679127)

  • 1. Insensitivity and oversensitivity to answer diagnosticity in hypothesis testing.
    Rusconi P; McKenzie CR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2443-64. PubMed ID: 23679127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Increased sensitivity to differentially diagnostic answers using familiar materials: implications for confirmation bias.
    McKenzie CR
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Apr; 34(3):577-88. PubMed ID: 16933767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finding useful questions: on Bayesian diagnosticity, probability, impact, and information gain.
    Nelson JD
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Oct; 112(4):979-99. PubMed ID: 16262476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence evaluation: measure Z corresponds to human utility judgments better than measure L and optimal-experimental-design models.
    Rusconi P; Marelli M; D'Addario M; Russo S; Cherubini P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):703-23. PubMed ID: 24446753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Information selection and use in hypothesis testing: what is a good question, and what is a good answer?
    Slowiaczek LM; Klayman J; Sherman SJ; Skov RB
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Jul; 20(4):392-405. PubMed ID: 1495401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preferences for different questions when testing hypotheses in an abstract task: positivity does play a role, asymmetry does not.
    Cherubini P; Rusconi P; Russo S; Di Bari S; Sacchi S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jun; 134(2):162-74. PubMed ID: 20223439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prime diagnosticity in short-term repetition priming: is primed evidence discounted, even when it reliably indicates the correct answer?
    Weidemann CT; Huber DE; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):257-81. PubMed ID: 18315405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity and diagnosticity of NASA-TLX and simplified SWAT to assess the mental workload associated with operating an agricultural sprayer.
    Dey A; Mann DD
    Ergonomics; 2010 Jul; 53(7):848-57. PubMed ID: 20582766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "You can't tell just by looking!": beliefs in the diagnosticity of visual cues explain response biases in social categorization.
    Lick DJ; Johnson KL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1494-506. PubMed ID: 25246038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Past experience influences object representation in working memory.
    Wagar BM; Dixon MJ
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Apr; 57(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 15780458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The embodied cognition theory and the motor component of "yes" and "no" verbal responses.
    Brouillet T; Heurley L; Martin S; Brouillet D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 20394911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Moderators of the feature-positive effect in abstract hypothesis-evaluation tasks.
    Rusconi P; Crippa F; Russo S; Cherubini P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Sep; 66(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 22612328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regulation of memory accuracy with multiple answers: the plurality option.
    Luna K; Higham PA; Martín-Luengo B
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Jun; 17(2):148-58. PubMed ID: 21500935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the diagnosticity of multiple-witness identifications.
    Clark SE; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Oct; 32(5):406-22. PubMed ID: 18095147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confirming expectations in asymmetric and symmetric social hypothesis testing.
    Rusconi P; Sacchi S; Toscano A; Cherubini P
    Exp Psychol; 2012 Jan; 59(5):243-50. PubMed ID: 22580410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Influence of Confirmation Bias on Memory and Source Monitoring.
    Frost P; Casey B; Griffin K; Raymundo L; Farrell C; Carrigan R
    J Gen Psychol; 2015; 142(4):238-52. PubMed ID: 26649923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Duration sensitivity depends on stimulus familiarity.
    Morewedge CK; Kassam KS; Hsee CK; Caruso EM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 19397378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The confidence-accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification decisions: Effects of exposure duration, retention interval, and divided attention.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N; Nagesh A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Mar; 19(1):55-71. PubMed ID: 23544475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How simple can it get? Measuring pain with NRS items or binary items.
    Rothaug J; Weiss T; Meissner W
    Clin J Pain; 2013 Mar; 29(3):224-32. PubMed ID: 23369928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid recollection of foresight judgments increases hindsight bias in a memory design.
    Calvillo DP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):959-64. PubMed ID: 22582966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.