142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23679150)
1. Comparison of three models of actigraph accelerometers during free living and controlled laboratory conditions.
Lee KY; Macfarlane DJ; Cerin E
Eur J Sport Sci; 2013; 13(3):332-9. PubMed ID: 23679150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the Actigraph GT1M and GT3X accelerometers under standardized and free-living conditions.
Kaminsky LA; Ozemek C
Physiol Meas; 2012 Nov; 33(11):1869-76. PubMed ID: 23111061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of activity monitors in controlled and free-living environments.
Feito Y; Bassett DR; Thompson DL
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Apr; 44(4):733-41. PubMed ID: 21904249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity and Reliability of Fitbit Flex for Step Count, Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity and Activity Energy Expenditure.
Sushames A; Edwards A; Thompson F; McDermott R; Gebel K
PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0161224. PubMed ID: 27589592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the GT3X ActiGraph in children and comparison with the GT1M ActiGraph.
Hänggi JM; Phillips LR; Rowlands AV
J Sci Med Sport; 2013 Jan; 16(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 22749938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Actigraph accelerometer interinstrument reliability during free-living in adults.
McClain JJ; Sisson SB; Tudor-Locke C
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Sep; 39(9):1509-14. PubMed ID: 17805082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Lifecorder EX and ActiGraph accelerometers under free-living conditions.
McClain JJ; Craig CL; Sisson SB; Tudor-Locke C
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2007 Aug; 32(4):753-61. PubMed ID: 17622290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of ActiGraph's low-frequency filter in laboratory and free-living environments.
Feito Y; Garner HR; Bassett DR
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Jan; 47(1):211-7. PubMed ID: 24870583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors in persons with multiple sclerosis and controls.
Sandroff BM; Motl RW
Disabil Rehabil; 2013 May; 35(9):725-31. PubMed ID: 23557239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative interinstrument reliability of uniaxial and triaxial accelerometers in free-living conditions.
Vanhelst J; Baquet G; Gottrand F; Béghin L
Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Apr; 114(2):584-94. PubMed ID: 22755462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing accelerometer, pedometer and a questionnaire for measuring physical activity in bronchiectasis: a validity and feasibility study?
O'Neill B; McDonough SM; Wilson JJ; Bradbury I; Hayes K; Kirk A; Kent L; Cosgrove D; Bradley JM; Tully MA
Respir Res; 2017 Jan; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 28088206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity of activity monitors worn at multiple nontraditional locations under controlled and free-living conditions in young adult women.
Kumahara H; Ayabe M; Ichibakase M; Tashima A; Chiwata M; Takashi T
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2015 May; 40(5):448-56. PubMed ID: 25832964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of hip-mounted uniaxial accelerometry with heart-rate monitoring vs. triaxial accelerometry in the assessment of free-living energy expenditure in young children: the IDEFICS Validation Study.
Ojiambo R; Konstabel K; Veidebaum T; Reilly J; Verbestel V; Huybrechts I; Sioen I; Casajús JA; Moreno LA; Vicente-Rodriguez G; Bammann K; Tubic BM; Marild S; Westerterp K; Pitsiladis YP;
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2012 Nov; 113(10):1530-6. PubMed ID: 22995396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Head-to-head comparison between Actigraph 7164 and GT1M accelerometers in adolescents.
Tanha T; Tornberg ÅB; Wollmer P; Dencker M
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2013 Mar; 33(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 23383695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Kenz Lifecorder EX and ActiGraph accelerometers in 10-yr-old children.
McClain JJ; Sisson SB; Washington TL; Craig CL; Tudor-Locke C
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Apr; 39(4):630-8. PubMed ID: 17414800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a commercially available pedometer used to promote physical activity as part of a national programme.
Clemes SA; O'Connell S; Rogan LM; Griffiths PL
Br J Sports Med; 2010 Dec; 44(16):1178-83. PubMed ID: 19474004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of filter choice in GT3X accelerometer assessments of free-living activity.
Wanner M; Martin BW; Meier F; Probst-Hensch N; Kriemler S
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Jan; 45(1):170-7. PubMed ID: 22895373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accelerometer measured daily physical activity and sedentary pursuits--comparison between two models of the Actigraph and the importance of data reduction.
Tanha T; Tornberg Å; Dencker M; Wollmer P
BMC Res Notes; 2013 Oct; 6():439. PubMed ID: 24176143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of Fitbit-Flex as a measure of free-living physical activity in a community-based phase III cardiac rehabilitation population.
Alharbi M; Bauman A; Neubeck L; Gallagher R
Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2016 Sep; 23(14):1476-85. PubMed ID: 26907794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intensity classification accuracy of accelerometer-measured physical activities in Chinese children and youth.
Zhu Z; Chen P; Zhuang J
Res Q Exerc Sport; 2013 Dec; 84 Suppl 2():S4-11. PubMed ID: 24527562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
