These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23679150)

  • 21. Validation of the Kenz Lifecorder EX and ActiGraph GT1M accelerometers for walking and running in adults.
    Abel MG; Hannon JC; Sell K; Lillie T; Conlin G; Anderson D
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2008 Dec; 33(6):1155-64. PubMed ID: 19088773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Incidental and Planned Exercise Questionnaire for seniors: validity and responsiveness.
    Merom D; Delbaere K; Cumming R; Voukelatos A; Rissel C; Van Der Ploeg HP; Lord SR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014; 46(5):947-54. PubMed ID: 24743107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Calibration of ActiGraph GT3X, Actical and RT3 accelerometers in adolescents.
    Romanzini M; Petroski EL; Ohara D; Dourado AC; Reichert FF
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2014; 14(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 24533499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of step count measured by physical activity monitors: The effect of gait speed and anatomical placement site.
    Chow JJ; Thom JM; Wewege MA; Ward RE; Parmenter BJ
    Gait Posture; 2017 Sep; 57():199-203. PubMed ID: 28666177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the MyWellness Key accelerometer.
    Herrmann SD; Hart TL; Lee CD; Ainsworth BE
    Br J Sports Med; 2011 Feb; 45(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 19736173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study.
    Ferguson T; Rowlands AV; Olds T; Maher C
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Mar; 12():42. PubMed ID: 25890168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Validation of Physical Activity Tracking via Android Smartphones Compared to ActiGraph Accelerometer: Laboratory-Based and Free-Living Validation Studies.
    Hekler EB; Buman MP; Grieco L; Rosenberger M; Winter SJ; Haskell W; King AC
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2015 Apr; 3(2):e36. PubMed ID: 25881662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of four ActiGraph accelerometers during walking and running.
    John D; Tyo B; Bassett DR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2010 Feb; 42(2):368-74. PubMed ID: 19927022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults.
    Chu AH; Ng SH; Paknezhad M; Gauterin A; Koh D; Brown MS; Müller-Riemenschneider F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172535. PubMed ID: 28234953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Concurrent agreement between ActiGraph
    Lee LFR; Dall PM
    Med Eng Phys; 2019 Dec; 74():82-88. PubMed ID: 31604598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The use of individual cut points from treadmill walking to assess free-living moderate to vigorous physical activity in obese subjects by accelerometry: is it useful?
    Aadland E; Steene-Johannessen J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Nov; 12():172. PubMed ID: 23152980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Variability in measuring physical activity in children with cerebral palsy.
    Mitchell LE; Ziviani J; Boyd RN
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Jan; 47(1):194-200. PubMed ID: 24824775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Concurrent validity of the MOX activity monitor compared to the ActiGraph GT3X.
    van der Weegen S; Essers H; Spreeuwenberg M; Verwey R; Tange H; de Witte L; Meijer K
    Telemed J E Health; 2015 Apr; 21(4):259-66. PubMed ID: 25614938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validity of the ActivPAL™ and the ActiGraph monitors in preschoolers.
    De Decker E; De Craemer M; Santos-Lozano A; Van Cauwenberghe E; De Bourdeaudhuij I; Cardon G
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Oct; 45(10):2002-11. PubMed ID: 23524516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of a new wrist-worn accelerometer with a commonly used triaxial accelerometer under free-living conditions.
    Sasaki S; Ukawa S; Okada E; Wenjing Z; Kishi T; Sakamoto A; Tamakoshi A
    BMC Res Notes; 2018 Oct; 11(1):746. PubMed ID: 30342547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The validity of the commercially-available, low-cost, wrist-worn Movband accelerometer during treadmill exercise and free-living physical activity.
    Barkley JE; Glickman E; Fennell C; Kobak M; Frank M; Farnell G
    J Sports Sci; 2019 Apr; 37(7):735-740. PubMed ID: 30238836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of speed and step frequency during walking and running on motion sensor output.
    Rowlands AV; Stone MR; Eston RG
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Apr; 39(4):716-27. PubMed ID: 17414811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Limitations of cadence-based walking for assessing bouts of moderate-to vigorous-intensity physical activity under free-living conditions.
    Ayabe M; Brubaker PH; Sunami Y; Kumahara H; Schutz Y; Tanaka H
    J Sports Sci; 2013; 31(16):1805-14. PubMed ID: 23879643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors.
    Sasaki JE; John D; Freedson PS
    J Sci Med Sport; 2011 Sep; 14(5):411-6. PubMed ID: 21616714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Objective and subjective measures of sedentary behavior and physical activity.
    Hart TL; Ainsworth BE; Tudor-Locke C
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2011 Mar; 43(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 20631642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.