These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23680302)

  • 1. An evaluation of marginal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by direct metal laser sintering system.
    Kim KB; Kim WC; Kim HY; Kim JH
    Dent Mater; 2013 Jul; 29(7):e91-6. PubMed ID: 23680302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional evaluation of gaps associated with fixed dental prostheses fabricated with new technologies.
    Kim KB; Kim JH; Kim WC; Kim JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1432-6. PubMed ID: 25218032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and cast metal ceramic crowns.
    Tamac E; Toksavul S; Toman M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):909-13. PubMed ID: 24819532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study.
    Örtorp A; Jönsson D; Mouhsen A; Vult von Steyern P
    Dent Mater; 2011 Apr; 27(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 21163516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of manufacturing technique on marginal fit of cobalt chromium restorations: An
    Sarda AS; Bedia SV
    Indian J Dent Res; 2021; 32(4):495-499. PubMed ID: 35645078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
    Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Implant-Supported Metal Copings Fabricated with 3 Different Techniques: An In Vitro Study.
    Yildirim B; Paken G
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):315-320. PubMed ID: 30667169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of marginal/internal fit of chrome-cobalt crowns: Direct laser metal sintering versus computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing.
    Gunsoy S; Ulusoy M
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(5):636-44. PubMed ID: 27538553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Over-refractory casting technique as an alternative to one-piece multi-unit fixed partial denture frameworks.
    de Oliveira Correa G; Henriques GE; Mesquita MF; Sobrinho LC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 16543023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The marginal fit of selective laser melting-fabricated metal crowns: an in vitro study.
    Xu D; Xiang N; Wei B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1437-40. PubMed ID: 25001421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selective laser sintering versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang J; Li H; Xu L; Wang Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):897-904. PubMed ID: 33789799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Internal and marginal fit of cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses fabricated with 3 different techniques.
    Nesse H; Ulstein DM; Vaage MM; Øilo M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Nov; 114(5):686-92. PubMed ID: 26213267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison and evaluation of marginal and internal gaps in cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated using subtractive and additive manufacturing.
    Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jan; 62(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 28663024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vertical discrepancy and microleakage of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported structures luted with different cement types.
    Oyagüe RC; Sánchez-Turrión A; López-Lozano JF; Suárez-García MJ
    J Dent; 2012 Feb; 40(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 22108101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Internal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses produced by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing and the lost-wax metal casting technique assessed using the triple-scan protocol.
    Dahl BE; Dahl JE; Rønold HJ
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2018 Feb; 126(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 29171091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions.
    Ueda K; Beuer F; Stimmelmayr M; Erdelt K; Keul C; Güth JF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 26121970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium copings fabricated using the conventional and the direct metal laser sintering techniques: A comparative
    Ullattuthodi S; Cherian KP; Anandkumar R; Nambiar MS
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2017; 17(4):373-380. PubMed ID: 29249881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Internal fit evaluation of crowns prepared using a new dental crown fabrication technique: laser-sintered Co-Cr crowns.
    Ucar Y; Akova T; Akyil MS; Brantley WA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 19782828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
    Quante K; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses.
    Att W; Komine F; Gerds T; Strub JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19328277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.